Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 4 31B is 82% cheaper per million tokens than Composer 2. Composer 2 is $0.50 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens versus Gemma 4 31B at $0.14 / $0.40. Sources: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

    Sources: Cursor pricing (https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Composer 2

    Cursor

    $3.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $2.50

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    82%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Gemma 4 31B

    Google

    $0.54blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.14

    Output

    $0.40

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.46 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 4 31B over Composer 2.

    Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Composer 2
    Gemma 4 31B
    Provider
    Provider
    Cursor
    Google
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-03-19
    2026-04-02
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+257%
    $0.50
    $0.14
    Output Price+525%
    $2.50
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $3.00
    $0.54
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2025-01-01
    Throughput
    N/A
    1.2030715399542904 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    26.5%
    84.3%
    61.3%
    Roboflow Vision: SAM3 Birds
    89%
    Roboflow Vision: Local Video
    78%
    Roboflow Vision: RTSP Stream
    0%
    Roboflow Vision: Avocados
    80%
    Roboflow Vision: LPR
    39%
    43.4%
    9.6%
    76.9%
    88.4%
    89.2%
    1.4%
    85.6%
    61.3%
    85.2%
    66.4%
    55.0%
    86.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Composer 2 1|0 Gemma 4 31B

    Verdict

    Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B: the bottom line

    Gemma 4 31B offers significantly lower pricing, while Composer 2 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Composer 2 or Gemma 4 31B?

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 4 31B is 82% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.54 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Composer 2 costs $0.50 / $2.50 per million tokens ($3.00 blended). Sources: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B cost per million tokens?

    Composer 2 Cursor API pricing is $0.50 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Cursor. Gemma 4 31B Gemini API pricing is $0.14 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Composer 2 or Gemma 4 31B?

    Neither Composer 2 nor Gemma 4 31B has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B?

    Composer 2 supports a 200K token context window, while Gemma 4 31B supports 262K tokens. Gemma 4 31B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Composer 2 or Gemma 4 31B?

    Composer 2 leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 4 31B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Composer 2 or Gemma 4 31B better for production use?

    Both Composer 2 and Gemma 4 31B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 4 31B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Composer 2 and Gemma 4 31B in my app?

    Yes. Call Composer 2 through Cursor and Gemma 4 31B through Google with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Cursor API pricing and Gemini API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://cursor.com/docs/models/cursor-composer-2 and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Composer 2 and Gemma 4 31B?

    Composer 2 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Gemma 4 31B supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Composer 2 or Gemma 4 31B?

    Gemma 4 31B has a measured throughput of approximately 1.2030715399542904 tokens/second. Throughput data for Composer 2 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Composer 2 or Gemma 4 31B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Composer 2 vs Gemma 4 31B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Composer 2 costs $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Cursor

    1 models

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.