As of August 20, 2026, GPT-5.4 nano is 74% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Spark 1.2. GPT-5.4 nano is $0.20 / $1.25 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Spark 1.2 at $1.25 / $4.25. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/
Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI
Input
$0.20
Output
$1.25
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side
GPT-5.4 nanoMuse Spark 1.2Verdict
GPT-5.4 nano offers significantly lower pricing, while Muse Spark 1.2 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.
As of August 20, 2026, GPT-5.4 nano is 74% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GPT-5.4 nano costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.25 per million output tokens ($1.45 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25 / $4.25 per million tokens ($5.50 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
GPT-5.4 nano OpenAI API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.25 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Muse Spark 1.2 Meta API pricing is $1.25 input and $4.25 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Muse Spark 1.2 leads on SWE-bench Verified: GPT-5.4 nano at 69.8% vs Muse Spark 1.2 at 86.6%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.
GPT-5.4 nano supports a 400K token context window, while Muse Spark 1.2 supports 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.2 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Muse Spark 1.2 leads on 15 of 15 shared benchmarks versus GPT-5.4 nano's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Both GPT-5.4 nano and Muse Spark 1.2 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GPT-5.4 nano has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Yes. Call GPT-5.4 nano through OpenAI and Muse Spark 1.2 through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
GPT-5.4 nano supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Muse Spark 1.2 supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Muse Spark 1.2 has a measured throughput of approximately 22.636101613788817 tokens/second. Throughput data for GPT-5.4 nano is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GPT-5.4 nano or Muse Spark 1.2 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GPT-5.4 nano costs $0.20/M input and $1.25/M output. Muse Spark 1.2 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output.
Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.
The index
280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
