GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, GPT OSS 20B is 83% cheaper per million tokens than LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601. GPT OSS 20B is $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens versus LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Better value

    GPT OSS 20B

    OpenAI

    $0.25blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.05

    Output

    $0.20

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    83%
    cheaper

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

    Meituan

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.25 per million tokens by choosing GPT OSS 20B over LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601.

    GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    GPT OSS 20B
    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenAI
    Meituan
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-08-05
    2026-01-14
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-83%
    $0.05
    $0.30
    Output Price-83%
    $0.20
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.25
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    32.8K
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    1000 tok/s
    100 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    10.9%
    25.2%
    71.5%
    80.5%
    68.9%
    80.4%
    82.8%
    56.6%
    86.0%
    99.6%
    94.2%
    85.3%
    74.3%
    53.1%
    42.5%
    82.9%
    89.0%
    71.6%
    63.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    GPT OSS 20B 0|5 LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

    Verdict

    GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601: the bottom line

    GPT OSS 20B offers significantly lower pricing, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GPT OSS 20B or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    As of August 20, 2026, GPT OSS 20B is 83% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GPT OSS 20B costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens ($0.25 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 cost per million tokens?

    GPT OSS 20B OpenAI API pricing is $0.05 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via OpenAI. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 Meituan API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Meituan. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GPT OSS 20B or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 70%. GPT OSS 20B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    GPT OSS 20B supports a 131K token context window, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports 128K tokens. GPT OSS 20B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GPT OSS 20B or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks versus GPT OSS 20B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GPT OSS 20B or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 better for production use?

    Both GPT OSS 20B and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GPT OSS 20B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GPT OSS 20B and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 in my app?

    Yes. Call GPT OSS 20B through OpenAI and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 through Meituan with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and Meituan API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GPT OSS 20B and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    GPT OSS 20B supports up to 33K output tokens per request, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GPT OSS 20B or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    GPT OSS 20B runs at approximately 1000 tokens/second while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 runs at 100 tokens/second. GPT OSS 20B is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GPT OSS 20B or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GPT OSS 20B vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GPT OSS 20B costs $0.05/M input and $0.20/M output. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.