Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 9% cheaper per million tokens than Kimi-k1.5. Kimi-k1.5 is $0.15 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct at $1.20 / $1.20. Sources: https://platform.moonshot.ai/docs/pricing and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_1-nemotron-70b-instruct

    Sources: Moonshot AI pricing (https://platform.moonshot.ai/docs/pricing); NVIDIA pricing (https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_1-nemotron-70b-instruct)

    Kimi-k1.5

    Moonshot AI

    $2.65blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $2.50

    128K ctx|Proprietary
    9%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

    NVIDIA

    $2.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.20

    Output

    $1.20

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.25 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct over Kimi-k1.5.

    Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Kimi-k1.5Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

    Score vs price

    MMLU. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceKimi-k1.5Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
    Metric
    Kimi-k1.5
    Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Moonshot AI
    NVIDIA
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-01-20
    2024-10-01
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-88%
    $0.15
    $1.20
    Output Price+108%
    $2.50
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.65
    $2.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2023-12-01
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    87.2%
    77.5%
    96.2%
    87.4%
    80.2%
    70%
    85.6%
    69.2%
    88.3%
    91.4%
    91.4%
    81.9%
    74.9%
    80.6%
    9.0%
    58.6%
    84.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Kimi-k1.5 1|0 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

    Verdict

    Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct: the bottom line

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Kimi-k1.5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Kimi-k1.5 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 9% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($2.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Kimi-k1.5 costs $0.15 / $2.50 per million tokens ($2.65 blended). Sources: https://platform.moonshot.ai/docs/pricing and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_1-nemotron-70b-instruct. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Kimi-k1.5 Moonshot AI API pricing is $0.15 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Moonshot AI. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct NVIDIA API pricing is $1.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via NVIDIA. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Kimi-k1.5 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

    Neither Kimi-k1.5 nor Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

    Kimi-k1.5 supports a 128K token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports 131K tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Kimi-k1.5 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

    Kimi-k1.5 leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Kimi-k1.5 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Kimi-k1.5 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Kimi-k1.5 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Kimi-k1.5 through Moonshot AI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct through NVIDIA with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Moonshot AI API pricing and NVIDIA API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.moonshot.ai/docs/pricing and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3_1-nemotron-70b-instruct. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Kimi-k1.5 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

    Kimi-k1.5 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Kimi-k1.5 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

    Neither Kimi-k1.5 nor Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Kimi-k1.5 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Kimi-k1.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Kimi-k1.5 costs $0.15/M input and $2.50/M output. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct costs $1.20/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.