Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 87% cheaper per million tokens than Kimi K2 Base. Kimi K2 Base is $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 4 Scout at $0.08 / $0.30. Sources: https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2 and https://llama.meta.com/

    Sources: OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

    Kimi K2 Base

    Moonshot AI

    $2.87blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.57

    Output

    $2.30

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    87%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama 4 Scout

    Meta

    $0.38blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.08

    Output

    $0.30

    10M ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.49 per million tokens by choosing Llama 4 Scout over Kimi K2 Base.

    Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    MATH. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceKimi K2 BaseLlama 4 Scout
    Metric
    Kimi K2 Base
    Llama 4 Scout
    Provider
    Provider
    Moonshot AI
    Meta
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-07-11
    2025-04-05
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+612%
    $0.57
    $0.08
    Output Price+667%
    $2.30
    $0.30
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.87
    $0.38
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    10M
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    10M
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    76.1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    48.1%
    57.2%
    57.2%
    17.0%
    35.3%
    87.8%
    79.6%
    69.4%
    70.2%
    50.3%
    92.5%
    88.8%
    0%
    77.6%
    94.4%
    80.3%
    92.1%
    70.7%
    67.8%
    90.6%
    69.2%
    74.3%
    44.7%
    85.1%
    31.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Kimi K2 Base 2|2 Llama 4 Scout

    Verdict

    Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Llama 4 Scout has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Kimi K2 Base's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Base or Llama 4 Scout?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 4 Scout is 87% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens ($0.38 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Kimi K2 Base costs $0.57 / $2.30 per million tokens ($2.87 blended). Sources: https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2 and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout cost per million tokens?

    Kimi K2 Base OpenRouter API pricing is $0.57 input and $2.30 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Llama 4 Scout Meta API pricing is $0.08 input and $0.30 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Kimi K2 Base or Llama 4 Scout?

    Llama 4 Scout has a published LiveCodeBench score of 32.8%. Kimi K2 Base does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout?

    Kimi K2 Base supports a 131K token context window, while Llama 4 Scout supports 10M tokens. Llama 4 Scout offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Kimi K2 Base or Llama 4 Scout?

    Kimi K2 Base and Llama 4 Scout are tied across 4 shared benchmarks. Check the table for category-level strengths. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Kimi K2 Base or Llama 4 Scout better for production use?

    Both Kimi K2 Base and Llama 4 Scout are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 4 Scout has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Kimi K2 Base and Llama 4 Scout in my app?

    Yes. Call Kimi K2 Base through OpenRouter and Llama 4 Scout through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenRouter API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://openrouter.ai/moonshotai/kimi-k2 and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Kimi K2 Base and Llama 4 Scout?

    Kimi K2 Base supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Llama 4 Scout supports up to 10M output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Kimi K2 Base or Llama 4 Scout?

    Llama 4 Scout has a measured throughput of approximately 76.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for Kimi K2 Base is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Kimi K2 Base or Llama 4 Scout from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Kimi K2 Base vs Llama 4 Scout pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Kimi K2 Base costs $0.57/M input and $2.30/M output via OpenRouter. Llama 4 Scout costs $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.