As of August 20, 2026, Laguna S 2.1 is 40% cheaper per million tokens than MiMo-V2.5. Laguna S 2.1 is $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens versus MiMo-V2.5 at $0.17 / $0.34. Sources: https://poolside.ai and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing
Sources: Poolside pricing (https://poolside.ai); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)
Laguna S 2.1
Poolside
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.20
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
Input
$0.17
Output
$0.34
Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side
Laguna S 2.1MiMo-V2.5Verdict
Laguna S 2.1 offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.
As of August 20, 2026, Laguna S 2.1 is 40% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens ($0.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.17 / $0.34 per million tokens ($0.50 blended). Sources: https://poolside.ai and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
Laguna S 2.1 Poolside API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Poolside. MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi API pricing is $0.17 input and $0.34 output per million tokens via Xiaomi. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
MiMo-V2.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 71%. Laguna S 2.1 does not have that eval on this page yet.
Laguna S 2.1 supports a 1M token context window, while MiMo-V2.5 supports 1M tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Laguna S 2.1 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus MiMo-V2.5's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Both Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Laguna S 2.1 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Yes. Call Laguna S 2.1 through Poolside and MiMo-V2.5 through Xiaomi with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
List rates are the latest published Poolside API pricing and Xiaomi API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://poolside.ai and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
Laguna S 2.1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while MiMo-V2.5 supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
MiMo-V2.5 has a measured throughput of approximately 87.03910406132043 tokens/second. Throughput data for Laguna S 2.1 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Laguna S 2.1 or MiMo-V2.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output. MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.17/M input and $0.34/M output.
Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.
The index
280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
