Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, LFM2.5-2.6B is 87% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens versus LFM2.5-2.6B at $0.02 / $0.02. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.liquid.ai

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Liquid AI pricing (https://www.liquid.ai)

    Gemma 3 27B

    Google

    $0.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.20

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    87%
    cheaper
    Better value

    LFM2.5-2.6B

    Liquid AI

    $0.04blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.02

    65.5K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.26 per million tokens by choosing LFM2.5-2.6B over Gemma 3 27B.

    Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemma 3 27BLFM2.5-2.6B

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 3 27BLFM2.5-2.6B
    Metric
    Gemma 3 27B
    LFM2.5-2.6B
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Liquid AI
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-03-12
    2026-08-04
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+400%
    $0.10
    $0.02
    Output Price+900%
    $0.20
    $0.02
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.30
    $0.04
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    65.5K
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    33 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    42.4%
    43.9%
    21.2%
    10%
    90.4%
    59.2%
    22.2%
    51.9%
    29.5%
    87.8%
    89%
    84.5%
    56.9%
    54.4%
    78%
    62.9%
    0%
    86.6%
    16.7%
    95.9%
    60.3%
    70.6%
    50.0%
    74.4%
    67.5%
    64.9%
    13.5%
    80.1%
    84.5%
    68.2%
    65.1%
    71%
    53.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 3 27B 0|1 LFM2.5-2.6B

    Verdict

    Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B: the bottom line

    LFM2.5-2.6B offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or LFM2.5-2.6B?

    As of August 30, 2026, LFM2.5-2.6B is 87% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.02 per million output tokens ($0.04 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10 / $0.20 per million tokens ($0.30 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.liquid.ai. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 3 27B Gemini API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Google. LFM2.5-2.6B Liquid AI API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.02 output per million tokens via Liquid AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 3 27B or LFM2.5-2.6B?

    Gemma 3 27B has a published LiveCodeBench score of 29.7%. LFM2.5-2.6B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B?

    Gemma 3 27B supports a 131K token context window, while LFM2.5-2.6B supports 66K tokens. Gemma 3 27B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 3 27B or LFM2.5-2.6B?

    LFM2.5-2.6B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 3 27B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 3 27B or LFM2.5-2.6B better for production use?

    Both Gemma 3 27B and LFM2.5-2.6B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, LFM2.5-2.6B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 3 27B and LFM2.5-2.6B in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 3 27B through Google and LFM2.5-2.6B through Liquid AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Liquid AI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.liquid.ai. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 3 27B and LFM2.5-2.6B?

    Gemma 3 27B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while LFM2.5-2.6B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 3 27B or LFM2.5-2.6B?

    Gemma 3 27B has a measured throughput of approximately 33 tokens/second. Throughput data for LFM2.5-2.6B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 3 27B or LFM2.5-2.6B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 3 27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output. LFM2.5-2.6B costs $0.02/M input and $0.02/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.