Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 17% cheaper per million tokens than Ling-3.0-flash. Ling-3.0-flash is $0.06 / $0.18 per million input/output tokens versus Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 at $0.04 / $0.16. Sources: https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/ and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1

    Sources: inclusionAI pricing (https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/); NVIDIA pricing (https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1)

    Ling-3.0-flash

    inclusionAI

    $0.24blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.06

    Output

    $0.18

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    17%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

    NVIDIA

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.04

    Output

    $0.16

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.04 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 over Ling-3.0-flash.

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Ling-3.0-flash
    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
    Provider
    Provider
    inclusionAI
    NVIDIA
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-07-23
    2025-03-18
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+50%
    $0.06
    $0.04
    Output Price+12%
    $0.18
    $0.16
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.24
    $0.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    32.8K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2023-12-31
    Throughput
    1000 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    54.1%
    79.3%
    47.1%
    95.4%
    63.6%
    84.6%
    81%

    Verdict

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Ling-3.0-flash's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Ling-3.0-flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 17% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 costs $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06 / $0.18 per million tokens ($0.24 blended). Sources: https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/ and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 cost per million tokens?

    Ling-3.0-flash inclusionAI API pricing is $0.06 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via inclusionAI. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 NVIDIA API pricing is $0.04 input and $0.16 output per million tokens via NVIDIA. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Ling-3.0-flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

    Neither Ling-3.0-flash nor Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

    Ling-3.0-flash supports a 262K token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports 128K tokens. Ling-3.0-flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Ling-3.0-flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

    Shared benchmark scores for Ling-3.0-flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Ling-3.0-flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 better for production use?

    Both Ling-3.0-flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Ling-3.0-flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 in my app?

    Yes. Call Ling-3.0-flash through inclusionAI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 through NVIDIA with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published inclusionAI API pricing and NVIDIA API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/ and https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Ling-3.0-flash and Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

    Ling-3.0-flash supports up to 33K output tokens per request, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Ling-3.0-flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1?

    Ling-3.0-flash has a measured throughput of approximately 1000 tokens/second. Throughput data for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Ling-3.0-flash or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 costs $0.04/M input and $0.16/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    0 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.