Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 97% cheaper per million tokens than Mistral Medium 3.5. Ling-3.0-flash is $0.06 / $0.18 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral Medium 3.5 at $1.50 / $7.50. Sources: https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: inclusionAI pricing (https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Better value

    Ling-3.0-flash

    inclusionAI

    $0.24blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.06

    Output

    $0.18

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    97%
    cheaper

    Mistral Medium 3.5

    Mistral

    $9.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.50

    Output

    $7.50

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $8.76 per million tokens by choosing Ling-3.0-flash over Mistral Medium 3.5.

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Ling-3.0-flash
    Mistral Medium 3.5
    Provider
    Provider
    inclusionAI
    Mistral
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-07-23
    2026-04-29
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-96%
    $0.06
    $1.50
    Output Price-98%
    $0.18
    $7.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.24
    $9.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    32.8K
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    1000 tok/s
    0.9605563235026328 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    34.9%
    39.6%
    48.6%
    69%
    86.3%
    66.9%
    95.8%
    58.8%
    0%
    11.2%
    33.8%
    67.7%
    75.3%
    37.6%
    13.4%
    76.1%
    91.4%
    68.0%

    Verdict

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Ling-3.0-flash has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Mistral Medium 3.5's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Ling-3.0-flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    As of August 20, 2026, Ling-3.0-flash is 97% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens ($0.24 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 / $7.50 per million tokens ($9.00 blended). Sources: https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5 cost per million tokens?

    Ling-3.0-flash inclusionAI API pricing is $0.06 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via inclusionAI. Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral API pricing is $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Ling-3.0-flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 77.6%. Ling-3.0-flash does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Ling-3.0-flash supports a 262K token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256K tokens. Ling-3.0-flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Ling-3.0-flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Shared benchmark scores for Ling-3.0-flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Ling-3.0-flash or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for production use?

    Both Ling-3.0-flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Ling-3.0-flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Ling-3.0-flash and Mistral Medium 3.5 in my app?

    Yes. Call Ling-3.0-flash through inclusionAI and Mistral Medium 3.5 through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published inclusionAI API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developer.ant-ling.com/en/docs/models/ling/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Ling-3.0-flash and Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Ling-3.0-flash supports up to 33K output tokens per request, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Ling-3.0-flash or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Ling-3.0-flash runs at approximately 1000 tokens/second while Mistral Medium 3.5 runs at 0.9605563235026328 tokens/second. Ling-3.0-flash is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Ling-3.0-flash or Mistral Medium 3.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Ling-3.0-flash vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Ling-3.0-flash costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    0 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.