Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 60% cheaper per million tokens than Step-3.5-Flash. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is $0.04 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens versus Step-3.5-Flash at $0.10 / $0.40. Sources: https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1 and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: NVIDIA pricing (https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Better value

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

    NVIDIA

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.04

    Output

    $0.16

    128K ctx|Open Source
    60%
    cheaper

    Step-3.5-Flash

    StepFun

    $0.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.40

    65.5K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.30 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 over Step-3.5-Flash.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1Step-3.5-Flash

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1Step-3.5-Flash
    Metric
    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
    Step-3.5-Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    NVIDIA
    StepFun
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-03-18
    2026-02-02
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-60%
    $0.04
    $0.10
    Output Price-60%
    $0.16
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $0.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    65.5K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    8.2K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2023-12-31
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    150 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    54.1%
    79.3%
    47.1%
    97.3%
    95.4%
    63.6%
    84.6%
    81%
    88.2%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 0|1 Step-3.5-Flash

    Verdict

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash: the bottom line

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 offers significantly lower pricing, while Step-3.5-Flash leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Step-3.5-Flash?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 60% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 costs $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Step-3.5-Flash costs $0.10 / $0.40 per million tokens ($0.50 blended). Sources: https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1 and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash cost per million tokens?

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 NVIDIA API pricing is $0.04 input and $0.16 output per million tokens via NVIDIA. Step-3.5-Flash StepFun API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via StepFun. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Step-3.5-Flash?

    Step-3.5-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 74.4%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash?

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports a 128K token context window, while Step-3.5-Flash supports 66K tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Step-3.5-Flash?

    Step-3.5-Flash leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Step-3.5-Flash better for production use?

    Both Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Step-3.5-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Step-3.5-Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 through NVIDIA and Step-3.5-Flash through StepFun with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published NVIDIA API pricing and StepFun API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1 and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Step-3.5-Flash?

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Step-3.5-Flash supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Step-3.5-Flash?

    Step-3.5-Flash has a measured throughput of approximately 150 tokens/second. Throughput data for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Step-3.5-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Step-3.5-Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 costs $0.04/M input and $0.16/M output. Step-3.5-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.