LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, LFM2.5-VL-3B is 90% cheaper per million tokens than LongCat-Flash-Chat. LFM2.5-VL-3B is $0.05 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens versus LongCat-Flash-Chat at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://www.liquid.ai and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Liquid AI pricing (https://www.liquid.ai); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Better value

    LFM2.5-VL-3B

    Liquid AI

    $0.15blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.05

    Output

    $0.10

    65.5K ctx|Open Source
    90%
    cheaper

    LongCat-Flash-Chat

    Meituan

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.35 per million tokens by choosing LFM2.5-VL-3B over LongCat-Flash-Chat.

    LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    LFM2.5-VL-3BLongCat-Flash-Chat

    Score vs price

    IFEval. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLFM2.5-VL-3BLongCat-Flash-Chat
    Metric
    LFM2.5-VL-3B
    LongCat-Flash-Chat
    Provider
    Provider
    Liquid AI
    Meituan
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-12
    2025-08-29
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-83%
    $0.05
    $0.30
    Output Price-92%
    $0.10
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.15
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    65.5K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    100 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    73.2%
    82.3%
    89.7%
    25.8%
    30.5%
    61.3%
    96.4%
    89.7%
    88.4%
    32.5%
    61.5%
    81.3%
    84.3%
    91.1%
    79.1%
    60.6%
    73.1%
    82.7%
    48.4%
    63.3%
    58.3%
    59.4%
    84.2%
    88.7%
    73.1%
    87.9%
    35.4%
    84.3%
    89.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    LFM2.5-VL-3B 0|1 LongCat-Flash-Chat

    Verdict

    LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat: the bottom line

    LFM2.5-VL-3B offers significantly lower pricing, while LongCat-Flash-Chat leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat FAQ

    Which is cheaper, LFM2.5-VL-3B or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    As of August 30, 2026, LFM2.5-VL-3B is 90% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. LFM2.5-VL-3B costs $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.15 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). LongCat-Flash-Chat costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://www.liquid.ai and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat cost per million tokens?

    LFM2.5-VL-3B Liquid AI API pricing is $0.05 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Liquid AI. LongCat-Flash-Chat Meituan API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Meituan. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, LFM2.5-VL-3B or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 60.4%. LFM2.5-VL-3B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    LFM2.5-VL-3B supports a 66K token context window, while LongCat-Flash-Chat supports 128K tokens. LongCat-Flash-Chat offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, LFM2.5-VL-3B or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus LFM2.5-VL-3B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is LFM2.5-VL-3B or LongCat-Flash-Chat better for production use?

    Both LFM2.5-VL-3B and LongCat-Flash-Chat are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, LFM2.5-VL-3B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between LFM2.5-VL-3B and LongCat-Flash-Chat in my app?

    Yes. Call LFM2.5-VL-3B through Liquid AI and LongCat-Flash-Chat through Meituan with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Liquid AI API pricing and Meituan API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://www.liquid.ai and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for LFM2.5-VL-3B and LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    LFM2.5-VL-3B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while LongCat-Flash-Chat supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, LFM2.5-VL-3B or LongCat-Flash-Chat?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat has a measured throughput of approximately 100 tokens/second. Throughput data for LFM2.5-VL-3B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open LFM2.5-VL-3B or LongCat-Flash-Chat from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    LFM2.5-VL-3B vs LongCat-Flash-Chat pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. LFM2.5-VL-3B costs $0.05/M input and $0.10/M output. LongCat-Flash-Chat costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.