LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, LongCat-Flash-Chat is 59% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3.8-27B. LongCat-Flash-Chat is $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.8-27B at $0.45 / $3.20. Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing

    Sources: AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing); Qwen pricing (https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing)

    Better value

    LongCat-Flash-Chat

    Meituan

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    59%
    cheaper

    Qwen3.8-27B

    Qwen

    $3.65blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.45

    Output

    $3.20

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.15 per million tokens by choosing LongCat-Flash-Chat over Qwen3.8-27B.

    LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    LongCat-Flash-Chat
    Qwen3.8-27B
    Provider
    Provider
    Meituan
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-08-29
    2026-08-14
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-33%
    $0.30
    $0.45
    Output Price-63%
    $1.20
    $3.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.50
    $3.65
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    100 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    30.8%
    73.2%
    89.2%
    42.2%
    89.7%
    79.5%
    84.3%
    90.2%
    61.3%
    96.4%
    89.7%
    88.4%
    81.9%
    85.6%
    56.9%
    84.3%
    70.7%
    79.1%
    65.5%
    33.4%
    94.6%
    82.7%
    42.3%
    85.9%
    38.6%
    62.9%
    89.3%
    Benchmark Wins
    LongCat-Flash-Chat 0|2 Qwen3.8-27B

    Verdict

    LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B: the bottom line

    LongCat-Flash-Chat offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3.8-27B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, LongCat-Flash-Chat or Qwen3.8-27B?

    As of August 20, 2026, LongCat-Flash-Chat is 59% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. LongCat-Flash-Chat costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3.8-27B costs $0.45 / $3.20 per million tokens ($3.65 blended). Sources: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B cost per million tokens?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat Meituan API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Meituan. Qwen3.8-27B Qwen API pricing is $0.45 input and $3.20 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, LongCat-Flash-Chat or Qwen3.8-27B?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 60.4%. Qwen3.8-27B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat supports a 128K token context window, while Qwen3.8-27B supports 262K tokens. Qwen3.8-27B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, LongCat-Flash-Chat or Qwen3.8-27B?

    Qwen3.8-27B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus LongCat-Flash-Chat's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is LongCat-Flash-Chat or Qwen3.8-27B better for production use?

    Both LongCat-Flash-Chat and Qwen3.8-27B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, LongCat-Flash-Chat has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between LongCat-Flash-Chat and Qwen3.8-27B in my app?

    Yes. Call LongCat-Flash-Chat through Meituan and Qwen3.8-27B through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meituan API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for LongCat-Flash-Chat and Qwen3.8-27B?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.8-27B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, LongCat-Flash-Chat or Qwen3.8-27B?

    LongCat-Flash-Chat has a measured throughput of approximately 100 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3.8-27B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open LongCat-Flash-Chat or Qwen3.8-27B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    LongCat-Flash-Chat vs Qwen3.8-27B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. LongCat-Flash-Chat costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output. Qwen3.8-27B costs $0.45/M input and $3.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.