MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 87% cheaper per million tokens than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is $0.20 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct at $0.09 / $0.09. Sources: https://ai.azure.com and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Microsoft pricing (https://ai.azure.com); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Microsoft

    $1.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    87%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.18blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.09

    Output

    $0.09

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.22 per million tokens by choosing Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct over MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Microsoft
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-11
    2024-09-19
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+122%
    $0.20
    $0.09
    Output Price+1233%
    $1.20
    $0.09
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.40
    $0.18
    Model Details
    Context Window
    256K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    42 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    75.1%
    83%
    92.7%
    57.2%
    70.5%
    91.1%
    46.2%
    90.2%
    50.4%
    77.5%
    43.1%
    54.2%
    80.8%
    Benchmark Wins
    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash 1|0 Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

    Verdict

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 87% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.09 per million output tokens ($0.18 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.40 blended). Sources: https://ai.azure.com and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash Microsoft API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.09 input and $0.09 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads on SWE-bench Verified: MAI-Code-1.1-Flash at 72.6% vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct at 9%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports a 256K token context window, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct better for production use?

    Both MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call MAI-Code-1.1-Flash through Microsoft and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Microsoft API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.azure.com and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct?

    Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.