Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, MedGemma 4B IT is 85% cheaper per million tokens than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.20 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens versus MedGemma 4B IT at $0.02 / $0.04. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

    Meta

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    85%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MedGemma 4B IT

    Google

    $0.06blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.04

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.34 per million tokens by choosing MedGemma 4B IT over Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
    MedGemma 4B IT
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Google
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-12-06
    2025-05-20
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+900%
    $0.20
    $0.02
    Output Price+400%
    $0.20
    $0.04
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.40
    $0.06
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    50.5%
    47.4%
    26.0%
    92.1%
    5.1%
    31.9%
    86%
    88.4%
    77%
    77.3%
    48.1%
    0%
    71.8%
    50.2%
    18.8%
    91.1%
    88.9%
    68.9%
    69.8%
    19.9%
    62.3%
    49.9%

    Verdict

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. MedGemma 4B IT has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MedGemma 4B IT?

    As of August 30, 2026, MedGemma 4B IT is 85% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MedGemma 4B IT costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.04 per million output tokens ($0.06 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.20 / $0.20 per million tokens ($0.40 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT cost per million tokens?

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Meta API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Meta. MedGemma 4B IT Gemini API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.04 output per million tokens via Google. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MedGemma 4B IT?

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a published HumanEval score of 88.4%. MedGemma 4B IT does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT?

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports a 128K token context window, while MedGemma 4B IT supports 33K tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MedGemma 4B IT?

    Shared benchmark scores for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MedGemma 4B IT are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MedGemma 4B IT better for production use?

    Both Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MedGemma 4B IT are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MedGemma 4B IT has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MedGemma 4B IT in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 3.3 70B Instruct through Meta and MedGemma 4B IT through Google with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and Gemini API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct and MedGemma 4B IT?

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while MedGemma 4B IT supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MedGemma 4B IT?

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for MedGemma 4B IT is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 3.3 70B Instruct or MedGemma 4B IT from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 3.3 70B Instruct vs MedGemma 4B IT pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output. MedGemma 4B IT costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.