MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) is 71% cheaper per million tokens than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is $0.20 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) at $0.20 / $0.20. Sources: https://ai.azure.com and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: Microsoft pricing (https://ai.azure.com); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Microsoft

    $1.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    71%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)

    Mistral

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.20

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.00 per million tokens by choosing Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) over MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
    Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)
    Provider
    Provider
    Microsoft
    Mistral
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-11
    2025-12-04
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price0%
    $0.20
    $0.20
    Output Price+500%
    $1.20
    $0.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.40
    $0.40
    Model Details
    Context Window
    256K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    128.6 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    71.2%
    85%
    89.8%

    Verdict

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512): the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)?

    As of August 20, 2026, Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) is 71% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens ($0.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.40 blended). Sources: https://ai.azure.com and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) cost per million tokens?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash Microsoft API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) Mistral API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 72.6%. Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports a 256K token context window, while Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) supports 262K tokens. Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)?

    Shared benchmark scores for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) better for production use?

    Both MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) in my app?

    Yes. Call MAI-Code-1.1-Flash through Microsoft and Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Microsoft API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.azure.com and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512)?

    Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) has a measured throughput of approximately 128.6 tokens/second. Throughput data for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output. Ministral 3 (14B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.