Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Comparison

As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 4 26B-A4B is 71% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Glimmer-30B. Gemma 4 26B-A4B is $0.13 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Glimmer-30B at $0.35 / $1.50. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/

Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

Better value

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Google

$0.53blended / 1M

Input

$0.13

Output

$0.40

262.1K ctx|Open Source

71%

cheaper

Muse Glimmer-30B

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison

Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

Metric

Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Muse Glimmer-30B

Provider

Google

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B: the bottom line

Gemma 4 26B-A4B offers significantly lower pricing, while Muse Glimmer-30B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

View Gemma 4 26B-A4B details View Muse Glimmer-30B details

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 4 26B-A4B is 71% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.53 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.85 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

How much does Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B cost per million tokens?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B Gemini API pricing is $0.13 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Muse Glimmer-30B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 76%. Gemma 4 26B-A4B does not have that eval on this page yet.

What is the context window for Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports a 262K token context window, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. Gemma 4 26B-A4B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Muse Glimmer-30B leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 4 26B-A4B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

Is Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Glimmer-30B better for production use?

Both Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Muse Glimmer-30B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 4 26B-A4B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

Can I switch between Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Muse Glimmer-30B in my app?

Yes. Call Gemma 4 26B-A4B through Google and Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

How accurate is this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing data?

List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 26B-A4B and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemma 4 26B-A4B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Neither Gemma 4 26B-A4B nor Muse Glimmer-30B has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison?

Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 26B-A4B or Muse Glimmer-30B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

Gemma 4 26B-A4B vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing

This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 4 26B-A4B costs $0.13/M input and $0.40/M output. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output.

Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.