As of August 20, 2026, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is 100% cheaper per million tokens than Laguna S 2.1. Laguna S 2.1 is $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens versus Nemotron Nano 9B v2 at $0.00 / $0.00. Sources: https://poolside.ai and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models
Sources: Poolside pricing (https://poolside.ai); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)
Laguna S 2.1
Poolside
Input
$0.10
Output
$0.20
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
Input
$0.00
Output
$0.00
Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side
Laguna S 2.1Nemotron Nano 9B v2Verdict
Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Laguna S 2.1's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.
As of August 20, 2026, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is 100% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 costs $0.00 per million input tokens and $0.00 per million output tokens ($0.00 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10 / $0.20 per million tokens ($0.30 blended). Sources: https://poolside.ai and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
Laguna S 2.1 Poolside API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Poolside. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 OpenRouter API pricing is $0.00 input and $0.00 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Laguna S 2.1 has a published SWE-bench Pro score of 59.4%. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not have that eval on this page yet.
Laguna S 2.1 supports a 1M token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports 128K tokens. Laguna S 2.1 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Shared benchmark scores for Laguna S 2.1 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Both Laguna S 2.1 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Yes. Call Laguna S 2.1 through Poolside and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
List rates are the latest published Poolside API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://poolside.ai and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
Laguna S 2.1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Neither Laguna S 2.1 nor Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Laguna S 2.1 or Nemotron Nano 9B v2 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Laguna S 2.1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 costs $0.00/M input and $0.00/M output via OpenRouter.
Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.
The index
280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
