QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, QvQ-72B-Preview is 55% cheaper per million tokens than Seed 2.1 Pro. QvQ-72B-Preview is $1.20 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus Seed 2.1 Pro at $0.89 / $4.45. Sources: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing and https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao

    Sources: Qwen pricing (https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing); ByteDance pricing (https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao)

    Better value

    QvQ-72B-Preview

    Qwen

    $2.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.20

    Output

    $1.20

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    55%
    cheaper

    Seed 2.1 Pro

    ByteDance

    $5.34blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.89

    Output

    $4.45

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $2.94 per million tokens by choosing QvQ-72B-Preview over Seed 2.1 Pro.

    QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    QvQ-72B-PreviewSeed 2.1 Pro

    Score vs price

    MathVision. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceQvQ-72B-PreviewSeed 2.1 Pro
    Metric
    QvQ-72B-Preview
    Seed 2.1 Pro
    Provider
    Provider
    Qwen
    ByteDance
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2024-12-25
    2026-06-24
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+35%
    $1.20
    $0.89
    Output Price-73%
    $1.20
    $4.45
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.40
    $5.34
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32.8K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    55.7%
    32.7%
    59.8%
    86.2%
    78.8%
    50.6%
    83.8%
    82.7%
    86.4%
    87.9%
    70.3%
    65.8%
    33.8%
    62.5%
    73.7%
    81.4%
    70.9%
    95.5%
    63.6%
    42.5%
    65%
    70.2%
    82.8%
    73.1%
    79.3%
    72%
    46.3%
    31.2%
    65.2%
    54.3%
    79.3%
    48.3%
    78%
    89.7%
    35.9%
    94.5%
    71.4%
    90.7%
    62.9%
    70.7%
    35.9%
    73.1%
    74.9%
    50.2%
    47%
    63.2%
    72.2%
    70%
    80.7%
    54.6%
    86.7%
    55%
    74.5%
    59.8%
    70.8%
    35.2%
    79.5%
    71.1%
    80.5%
    89.2%
    68.2%
    51.4%
    54.3%
    78.4%
    67.6%
    53%
    18%
    Benchmark Wins
    QvQ-72B-Preview 0|2 Seed 2.1 Pro

    Verdict

    QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro: the bottom line

    QvQ-72B-Preview offers significantly lower pricing, while Seed 2.1 Pro leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro FAQ

    Which is cheaper, QvQ-72B-Preview or Seed 2.1 Pro?

    As of August 30, 2026, QvQ-72B-Preview is 55% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. QvQ-72B-Preview costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($2.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Seed 2.1 Pro costs $0.89 / $4.45 per million tokens ($5.34 blended). Sources: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing and https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro cost per million tokens?

    QvQ-72B-Preview Qwen API pricing is $1.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Qwen. Seed 2.1 Pro ByteDance API pricing is $0.89 input and $4.45 output per million tokens via ByteDance. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, QvQ-72B-Preview or Seed 2.1 Pro?

    Seed 2.1 Pro has a published SWE-bench Pro score of 57.5%. QvQ-72B-Preview does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro?

    QvQ-72B-Preview supports a 33K token context window, while Seed 2.1 Pro supports 262K tokens. Seed 2.1 Pro offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, QvQ-72B-Preview or Seed 2.1 Pro?

    Seed 2.1 Pro leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus QvQ-72B-Preview's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is QvQ-72B-Preview or Seed 2.1 Pro better for production use?

    Both QvQ-72B-Preview and Seed 2.1 Pro are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, QvQ-72B-Preview has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between QvQ-72B-Preview and Seed 2.1 Pro in my app?

    Yes. Call QvQ-72B-Preview through Qwen and Seed 2.1 Pro through ByteDance with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Qwen API pricing and ByteDance API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing and https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for QvQ-72B-Preview and Seed 2.1 Pro?

    QvQ-72B-Preview supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Seed 2.1 Pro supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, QvQ-72B-Preview or Seed 2.1 Pro?

    Neither QvQ-72B-Preview nor Seed 2.1 Pro has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open QvQ-72B-Preview or Seed 2.1 Pro from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    QvQ-72B-Preview vs Seed 2.1 Pro pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. QvQ-72B-Preview costs $1.20/M input and $1.20/M output. Seed 2.1 Pro costs $0.89/M input and $4.45/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.