Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Seed 2.1 Turbo is 18% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3.8-27B. Qwen3.8-27B is $0.45 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens versus Seed 2.1 Turbo at $0.50 / $2.50. Sources: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing and https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao

    Sources: Qwen pricing (https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing); ByteDance pricing (https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao)

    Qwen3.8-27B

    Qwen

    $3.65blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.45

    Output

    $3.20

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    18%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Seed 2.1 Turbo

    ByteDance

    $3.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $2.50

    262.1K ctx|Proprietary
    Save $0.65 per million tokens by choosing Seed 2.1 Turbo over Qwen3.8-27B.

    Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Qwen3.8-27B
    Seed 2.1 Turbo
    Provider
    Provider
    Qwen
    ByteDance
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-08-14
    2026-06-24
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-10%
    $0.45
    $0.50
    Output Price+28%
    $3.20
    $2.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $3.65
    $3.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    30.8%
    54.6%
    89.2%
    23%
    42.2%
    57.8%
    84.9%
    79.5%
    84.3%
    76.4%
    49.1%
    80.3%
    82.2%
    90.2%
    83.6%
    82.7%
    67.9%
    81.9%
    29.2%
    61.3%
    85.6%
    62.9%
    79.4%
    70.9%
    94.6%
    56.9%
    46%
    61.1%
    70.7%
    34.5%
    63.2%
    67%
    83.1%
    68.1%
    78.4%
    65.5%
    71.3%
    50.8%
    25.9%
    33.4%
    46.6%
    76.8%
    89.2%
    94.6%
    92.7%
    90.5%
    58.9%
    65.9%
    31.4%
    74.8%
    42%
    42.3%
    43.7%
    62.8%
    71.1%
    69.7%
    79.2%
    48.3%
    85.9%
    86.3%
    46.7%
    71.1%
    56.6%
    67.4%
    30.6%
    38.6%
    56.8%
    71.1%
    77.2%
    89%
    67.6%
    43.9%
    62.9%
    52.9%
    73.6%
    63.7%
    48.6%
    56.4%
    11%
    Benchmark Wins
    Qwen3.8-27B 7|4 Seed 2.1 Turbo

    Verdict

    Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo: the bottom line

    Seed 2.1 Turbo offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3.8-27B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

    As of August 20, 2026, Seed 2.1 Turbo is 18% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Seed 2.1 Turbo costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens ($3.00 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3.8-27B costs $0.45 / $3.20 per million tokens ($3.65 blended). Sources: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing and https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo cost per million tokens?

    Qwen3.8-27B Qwen API pricing is $0.45 input and $3.20 output per million tokens via Qwen. Seed 2.1 Turbo ByteDance API pricing is $0.50 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via ByteDance. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

    Qwen3.8-27B leads on SWE-bench Pro: Qwen3.8-27B at 61.7% vs Seed 2.1 Turbo at 57%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo?

    Qwen3.8-27B supports a 262K token context window, while Seed 2.1 Turbo supports 262K tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

    Qwen3.8-27B leads on 7 of 11 shared benchmarks versus Seed 2.1 Turbo's 4 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo better for production use?

    Both Qwen3.8-27B and Seed 2.1 Turbo are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Seed 2.1 Turbo has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Qwen3.8-27B and Seed 2.1 Turbo in my app?

    Yes. Call Qwen3.8-27B through Qwen and Seed 2.1 Turbo through ByteDance with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Qwen API pricing and ByteDance API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing and https://www.volcengine.com/product/doubao. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Qwen3.8-27B and Seed 2.1 Turbo?

    Qwen3.8-27B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Seed 2.1 Turbo supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo?

    Neither Qwen3.8-27B nor Seed 2.1 Turbo has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Qwen3.8-27B or Seed 2.1 Turbo from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Qwen3.8-27B vs Seed 2.1 Turbo pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Qwen3.8-27B costs $0.45/M input and $3.20/M output. Seed 2.1 Turbo costs $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    ByteDance

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.