Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, QwQ-32B-Preview is 81% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is $0.45 / $3.49 per million input/output tokens versus QwQ-32B-Preview at $0.15 / $0.60. Source: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Source: Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

    Qwen

    $3.94blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.45

    Output

    $3.49

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    81%
    cheaper
    Better value

    QwQ-32B-Preview

    Qwen

    $0.75blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.60

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $3.19 per million tokens by choosing QwQ-32B-Preview over Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
    QwQ-32B-Preview
    Provider
    Provider
    Qwen
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-09-22
    2024-11-28
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+200%
    $0.45
    $0.15
    Output Price+482%
    $3.49
    $0.60
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $3.94
    $0.75
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    262.1K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2024-11-28
    Throughput
    N/A
    76.04 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    13.6%
    65.2%
    44.4%
    88.2%
    38.1%
    69.3%
    66.1%
    89.7%
    50%
    90.6%
    90.6%
    89.2%
    53.7%
    71.9%
    67.1%
    81.5%
    63.5%
    93.7%
    93.4%
    96.5%
    52.5%
    77.4%
    11%
    80%
    89.5%
    40.3%
    63.6%
    74.6%
    92.7%
    83.8%
    90.6%
    83.8%
    80.6%
    93.7%
    80.6%
    78.7%
    80.1%
    79.1%
    71.2%
    87.5%
    43.2%
    68.3%
    81.3%
    92.4%
    95.4%
    77.3%
    61.3%
    34.9%
    64.3%
    80%
    34.4%
    86.7%
    97.3%

    Verdict

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. QwQ-32B-Preview has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or QwQ-32B-Preview?

    As of August 20, 2026, QwQ-32B-Preview is 81% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. QwQ-32B-Preview costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens ($0.75 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45 / $3.49 per million tokens ($3.94 blended). Sources: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview cost per million tokens?

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Qwen API pricing is $0.45 input and $3.49 output per million tokens via Qwen. QwQ-32B-Preview Qwen API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or QwQ-32B-Preview?

    QwQ-32B-Preview has a published LiveCodeBench score of 50%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview?

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports a 262K token context window, while QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or QwQ-32B-Preview?

    Shared benchmark scores for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and QwQ-32B-Preview are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or QwQ-32B-Preview better for production use?

    Both Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and QwQ-32B-Preview are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, QwQ-32B-Preview has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and QwQ-32B-Preview in my app?

    Yes. Call Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking through Qwen and QwQ-32B-Preview through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Qwen API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/ and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and QwQ-32B-Preview?

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports up to 262K output tokens per request, while QwQ-32B-Preview supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or QwQ-32B-Preview?

    QwQ-32B-Preview has a measured throughput of approximately 76.04 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or QwQ-32B-Preview from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs QwQ-32B-Preview pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.45/M input and $3.49/M output. QwQ-32B-Preview costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.