Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is 61% cheaper per million tokens than QwQ-32B. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is $0.20 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens versus QwQ-32B at $0.90 / $0.90. Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://fireworks.ai/pricing

    Sources: xAI API pricing (https://docs.x.ai/docs/models); Fireworks pricing (https://fireworks.ai/pricing)

    Better value

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning

    xAI

    $0.70blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.50

    2M ctx|Proprietary
    61%
    cheaper

    QwQ-32B

    Qwen

    $1.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.90

    Output

    $0.90

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.10 per million tokens by choosing Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning over QwQ-32B.

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-ReasoningQwQ-32B

    Score vs price

    BFCL. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGrok-4.1 Fast Non-ReasoningQwQ-32B
    Metric
    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning
    QwQ-32B
    Provider
    Provider
    xAI
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-11-17
    2025-03-05
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-78%
    $0.20
    $0.90
    Output Price-44%
    $0.50
    $0.90
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.70
    $1.80
    Model Details
    Context Window
    2M
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    30K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2024-11-28
    Throughput
    90 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    65.2%
    65.2%
    42.6%
    63.4%
    83.9%
    27.1%
    79.5%
    90.6%
    58.3%
    66.4%
    63.7%
    52.5%
    7.7%
    73.1%
    28.4%
    76.0%
    77.5%
    87.6%
    75.2%
    11.9%
    61.9%
    Benchmark Wins
    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning 0|2 QwQ-32B

    Verdict

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B: the bottom line

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers significantly lower pricing, while QwQ-32B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or QwQ-32B?

    As of August 30, 2026, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning is 61% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens ($0.70 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). QwQ-32B costs $0.90 / $0.90 per million tokens ($1.80 blended). Sources: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://fireworks.ai/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B cost per million tokens?

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning xAI API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.50 output per million tokens via xAI. QwQ-32B Fireworks API pricing is $0.90 input and $0.90 output per million tokens via Fireworks. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or QwQ-32B?

    QwQ-32B leads on LiveCodeBench: Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning at 42.6% vs QwQ-32B at 63.4%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B?

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports a 2M token context window, while QwQ-32B supports 131K tokens. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or QwQ-32B?

    QwQ-32B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or QwQ-32B better for production use?

    Both Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and QwQ-32B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and QwQ-32B in my app?

    Yes. Call Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning through xAI and QwQ-32B through Fireworks with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published xAI API pricing and Fireworks API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.x.ai/docs/models and https://fireworks.ai/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning and QwQ-32B?

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning supports up to 30K output tokens per request, while QwQ-32B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or QwQ-32B?

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning has a measured throughput of approximately 90 tokens/second. Throughput data for QwQ-32B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning or QwQ-32B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning vs QwQ-32B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Grok-4.1 Fast Non-Reasoning costs $0.20/M input and $0.50/M output. QwQ-32B costs $0.90/M input and $0.90/M output via Fireworks.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.