Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemini 1.5 Flash is 34% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. Gemini 1.5 Flash is $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at $0.14 / $1.00. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Better value

    Gemini 1.5 Flash

    Google

    $0.75blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.15

    Output

    $0.60

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    34%
    cheaper

    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Qwen

    $1.14blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.14

    Output

    $1.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.39 per million tokens by choosing Gemini 1.5 Flash over Qwen3.6-35B-A3B.

    Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemini 1.5 FlashQwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemini 1.5 FlashQwen3.6-35B-A3B
    Metric
    Gemini 1.5 Flash
    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-05-01
    2026-04-16
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+7%
    $0.15
    $0.14
    Output Price-40%
    $0.60
    $1.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.75
    $1.14
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    8.2K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2023-11-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    150 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    21.4%
    51%
    86%
    83.8%
    35.8%
    1249.48
    26.9%
    62.8%
    75.3%
    78%
    86.7%
    78.9%
    62.3%
    81.7%
    86.5%
    74.3%
    77.9%
    92.7%
    92.7%
    34.8%
    90%
    81.9%
    50%
    0.3%
    90.4%
    86.2%
    47.2%
    90.7%
    83.6%
    89.1%
    71.4%
    65.8%
    37%
    82.6%
    86.2%
    92.8%
    67.3%
    85.2%
    93.3%
    71.9%
    74.6%
    79.8%
    29.4%
    50.8%
    85.3%
    58.9%
    28.7%
    64.7%
    67.2%
    48.9%
    76.1%
    70.3%
    83.7%
    35.6%
    60.1%
    74.1%
    97%
    52.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemini 1.5 Flash 0|3 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Verdict

    Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: the bottom line

    Gemini 1.5 Flash offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemini 1.5 Flash is 34% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens ($0.75 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3.6-35B-A3B costs $0.14 / $1.00 per million tokens ($1.14 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B cost per million tokens?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash Gemini API pricing is $0.15 input and $0.60 output per million tokens via Google. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B OpenRouter API pricing is $0.14 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 73.4%. Gemini 1.5 Flash does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B supports 262K tokens. Gemini 1.5 Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Gemini 1.5 Flash's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B better for production use?

    Both Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemini 1.5 Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemini 1.5 Flash through Google and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemini 1.5 Flash and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash supports up to 8K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Gemini 1.5 Flash has a measured throughput of approximately 150 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemini 1.5 Flash or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemini 1.5 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B costs $0.14/M input and $1.00/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.