GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, GPT-4.1 nano is 7% cheaper per million tokens than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B). GPT-4.1 nano is $0.10 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) at $0.09 / $0.45. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Better value

    GPT-4.1 nano

    OpenAI

    $0.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.40

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    7%
    cheaper

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

    NVIDIA

    $0.54blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.09

    Output

    $0.45

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.04 per million tokens by choosing GPT-4.1 nano over Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).

    GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    tau-bench Retail. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGPT-4.1 nanoNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
    Metric
    GPT-4.1 nano
    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenAI
    NVIDIA
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-14
    2026-03-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+11%
    $0.10
    $0.09
    Output Price-11%
    $0.40
    $0.45
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.50
    $0.54
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    32.8K
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-05-31
    2025-06-01
    Throughput
    200 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    22.8%
    50.3%
    82.7%
    48.9%
    42.7%
    81.2%
    25.9%
    42.0%
    31.3%
    74.5%
    72.6%
    58.3%
    66.9%
    40.5%
    28.9%
    90.2%
    29.4%
    80.2%
    33.0%
    80.1%
    55.4%
    70%
    41.8%
    73.9%
    42.5%
    42.1%
    0%
    94.7%
    56.2%
    68.2%
    69.3%
    63.5%
    83.7%
    79.4%
    57.2%
    91.8%
    60.8%
    86.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    GPT-4.1 nano 0|7 Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

    Verdict

    GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B): the bottom line

    GPT-4.1 nano offers significantly lower pricing, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    As of August 25, 2026, GPT-4.1 nano is 7% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GPT-4.1 nano costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.09 / $0.45 per million tokens ($0.54 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) cost per million tokens?

    GPT-4.1 nano OpenAI API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) OpenRouter API pricing is $0.09 input and $0.45 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 53.7%. GPT-4.1 nano does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GPT-4.1 nano supports a 1M token context window, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports 1M tokens. GPT-4.1 nano offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks versus GPT-4.1 nano's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) better for production use?

    Both GPT-4.1 nano and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GPT-4.1 nano has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GPT-4.1 nano and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) in my app?

    Yes. Call GPT-4.1 nano through OpenAI and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GPT-4.1 nano and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GPT-4.1 nano supports up to 33K output tokens per request, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GPT-4.1 nano has a measured throughput of approximately 200 tokens/second. Throughput data for Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GPT-4.1 nano or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GPT-4.1 nano vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GPT-4.1 nano costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.