Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Step-3.5-Flash is 72% cheaper per million tokens than Llama 3.1 405B Instruct. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is $0.89 / $0.89 per million input/output tokens versus Step-3.5-Flash at $0.10 / $0.40. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

    Meta

    $1.78blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.89

    Output

    $0.89

    128K ctx|Open Source
    72%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Step-3.5-Flash

    StepFun

    $0.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.40

    65.5K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.28 per million tokens by choosing Step-3.5-Flash over Llama 3.1 405B Instruct.

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Llama 3.1 405B InstructStep-3.5-Flash

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 3.1 405B InstructStep-3.5-Flash
    Metric
    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
    Step-3.5-Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    StepFun
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-07-23
    2026-02-02
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+790%
    $0.89
    $0.10
    Output Price+122%
    $0.89
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.78
    $0.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    65.5K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    8.2K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    150 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    50.7%
    50.9%
    88.6%
    9.7%
    97.3%
    88.5%
    87.3%
    89%
    73.8%
    92%
    96.9%
    7.5%
    84.8%
    96.8%
    88.6%
    73.3%
    58.7%
    88.2%
    82.2%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct 0|1 Step-3.5-Flash

    Verdict

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash: the bottom line

    Step-3.5-Flash offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Step-3.5-Flash?

    As of August 25, 2026, Step-3.5-Flash is 72% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Step-3.5-Flash costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Llama 3.1 405B Instruct costs $0.89 / $0.89 per million tokens ($1.78 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash cost per million tokens?

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Meta API pricing is $0.89 input and $0.89 output per million tokens via Meta. Step-3.5-Flash StepFun API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via StepFun. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Step-3.5-Flash?

    Step-3.5-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 74.4%. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash?

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports a 128K token context window, while Step-3.5-Flash supports 66K tokens. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Step-3.5-Flash?

    Step-3.5-Flash leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.1 405B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Step-3.5-Flash better for production use?

    Both Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Step-3.5-Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Step-3.5-Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Step-3.5-Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 3.1 405B Instruct through Meta and Step-3.5-Flash through StepFun with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and StepFun API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Step-3.5-Flash?

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Step-3.5-Flash supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Step-3.5-Flash?

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct runs at approximately 42 tokens/second while Step-3.5-Flash runs at 150 tokens/second. Step-3.5-Flash is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Step-3.5-Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Step-3.5-Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct costs $0.89/M input and $0.89/M output. Step-3.5-Flash costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    0 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.