Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 82% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at $0.14 / $1.00. Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Better value

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

    Mistral

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    82%
    cheaper

    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Qwen

    $1.14blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.14

    Output

    $1.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.94 per million tokens by choosing Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) over Qwen3.6-35B-A3B.

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceMin istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
    Metric
    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
    Provider
    Provider
    Mistral
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-12-04
    2026-04-16
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-29%
    $0.10
    $0.14
    Output Price-90%
    $0.10
    $1.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $1.14
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131.1K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    1222 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    21.4%
    53.4%
    86%
    83.8%
    35.8%
    1249.48
    26.9%
    62.8%
    75.3%
    78%
    72.1%
    86.7%
    77.5%
    81.7%
    92.7%
    92.7%
    90%
    81.9%
    50%
    0.3%
    90.7%
    83.6%
    89.1%
    71.4%
    37%
    86.2%
    92.8%
    85.2%
    93.3%
    74.6%
    29.4%
    50.8%
    85.3%
    58.9%
    28.7%
    64.7%
    67.2%
    83.7%
    35.6%
    60.1%
    52.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) 0|2 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

    Verdict

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B: the bottom line

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    As of August 25, 2026, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 82% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3.6-35B-A3B costs $0.14 / $1.00 per million tokens ($1.14 blended). Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B cost per million tokens?

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) Mistral API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B OpenRouter API pricing is $0.14 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 73.4%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports a 131K token context window, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B supports 262K tokens. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Qwen3.6-35B-A3B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B better for production use?

    Both Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B in my app?

    Yes. Call Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) through Mistral AI and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Mistral API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) has a measured throughput of approximately 1222 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via Mistral AI. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B costs $0.14/M input and $1.00/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.