Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Maverick is 89% cheaper per million tokens than Mistral Medium 3.5. Llama 4 Maverick is $0.17 / $0.85 per million input/output tokens versus Mistral Medium 3.5 at $1.50 / $7.50. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/)

    Better value

    Llama 4 Maverick

    Meta

    $1.02blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.17

    Output

    $0.85

    1M ctx|Open Source
    89%
    cheaper

    Mistral Medium 3.5

    Mistral

    $9.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.50

    Output

    $7.50

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $7.98 per million tokens by choosing Llama 4 Maverick over Mistral Medium 3.5.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    GPQA Diamond. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 4 MaverickMistral Medium 3.5
    Metric
    Llama 4 Maverick
    Mistral Medium 3.5
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    Mistral
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-04-05
    2026-04-29
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-89%
    $0.17
    $1.50
    Output Price-89%
    $0.85
    $7.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.02
    $9.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    1M
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    69.4 tok/s
    1 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    5.7%
    69.8%
    69.8%
    34.9%
    33.1%
    39.6%
    48.6%
    69%
    59.6%
    53.6%
    86.3%
    85.5%
    73.4%
    61.2%
    66.9%
    90%
    95.8%
    58.8%
    0%
    0%
    94.4%
    11.2%
    73.7%
    77.6%
    33.8%
    67.7%
    92.3%
    80.5%
    75.3%
    37.6%
    13.4%
    76.1%
    91.4%
    68.0%
    31.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 4 Maverick 2|1 Mistral Medium 3.5

    Verdict

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5: the bottom line

    Llama 4 Maverick offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    As of August 25, 2026, Llama 4 Maverick is 89% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17 per million input tokens and $0.85 per million output tokens ($1.02 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 / $7.50 per million tokens ($9.00 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5 cost per million tokens?

    Llama 4 Maverick Meta API pricing is $0.17 input and $0.85 output per million tokens via Meta. Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral API pricing is $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Mistral Medium 3.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 77.6%. Llama 4 Maverick does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports a 1M token context window, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports 256K tokens. Llama 4 Maverick offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Llama 4 Maverick leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Mistral Medium 3.5's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for production use?

    Both Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 4 Maverick has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5 in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 4 Maverick through Meta and Mistral Medium 3.5 through Mistral AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and Mistral API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 4 Maverick and Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1M output tokens per request, while Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5?

    Llama 4 Maverick runs at approximately 69.4 tokens/second while Mistral Medium 3.5 runs at 1 tokens/second. Llama 4 Maverick is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 4 Maverick or Mistral Medium 3.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 4 Maverick vs Mistral Medium 3.5 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.85/M output. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via Mistral AI.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.