GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, GLM-4.7-Flash is 100% cheaper per million tokens than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B). GLM-4.7-Flash is $0.00 / $0.00 per million input/output tokens versus Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) at $0.09 / $0.45. Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Z AI pricing (https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Better value

    GLM-4.7-Flash

    Z AI

    $0.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.00

    Output

    $0.00

    202.8K ctx|Open Source
    100%
    cheaper

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

    NVIDIA

    $0.54blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.09

    Output

    $0.45

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.54 per million tokens by choosing GLM-4.7-Flash over Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    SWE-bench Verified. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGLM-4.7-FlashNemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
    Metric
    GLM-4.7-Flash
    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
    Provider
    Provider
    Z AI
    NVIDIA
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-01-19
    2026-03-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-100%
    $0.00
    $0.09
    Output Price-100%
    $0.00
    $0.45
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.00
    $0.54
    Model Details
    Context Window
    202.8K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    16.4K
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2025-06-01
    Throughput
    50 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    14.4%
    22.8%
    75.2%
    82.7%
    42.0%
    42.8%
    31.3%
    72.6%
    58.3%
    91.6%
    90.2%
    41.8%
    94.7%
    83.7%
    79.4%
    91.8%
    79.5%
    86.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    GLM-4.7-Flash 3|2 Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

    Verdict

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B): the bottom line

    GLM-4.7-Flash offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    As of August 25, 2026, GLM-4.7-Flash is 100% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.00 per million input tokens and $0.00 per million output tokens ($0.00 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.09 / $0.45 per million tokens ($0.54 blended). Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) cost per million tokens?

    GLM-4.7-Flash Z AI API pricing is $0.00 input and $0.00 output per million tokens via Z AI. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) OpenRouter API pricing is $0.09 input and $0.45 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GLM-4.7-Flash leads on SWE-bench Verified: GLM-4.7-Flash at 59.2% vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) at 53.7%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GLM-4.7-Flash supports a 203K token context window, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports 1M tokens. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GLM-4.7-Flash leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks versus Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s 2 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) better for production use?

    Both GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GLM-4.7-Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) in my app?

    Yes. Call GLM-4.7-Flash through Z AI and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Z AI API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GLM-4.7-Flash supports up to 16K output tokens per request, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

    GLM-4.7-Flash has a measured throughput of approximately 50 tokens/second. Throughput data for Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.00/M input and $0.00/M output. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.