Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 4 31B is 70% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct. Gemma 4 31B is $0.14 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct at $0.80 / $1.00. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models)

    Better value

    Gemma 4 31B

    Google

    $0.54blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.14

    Output

    $0.40

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    70%
    cheaper

    Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

    Qwen

    $1.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.80

    Output

    $1.00

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.26 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 4 31B over Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

    Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Gemma 4 31BQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

    Score vs price

    MMMU-Pro. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 4 31BQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
    Metric
    Gemma 4 31B
    Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-04-02
    2025-01-26
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-83%
    $0.14
    $0.80
    Output Price-60%
    $0.40
    $1.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.54
    $1.80
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-01-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    1.2 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    26.5%
    84.3%
    43.4%
    9.6%
    8.8%
    76.9%
    51.1%
    88.4%
    70.2%
    88.4%
    89.2%
    83.2%
    79.8%
    89.5%
    1.4%
    96.4%
    76.2%
    47.3%
    85.6%
    38.1%
    61.3%
    74.6%
    88%
    85.2%
    70.8%
    76.2%
    66.4%
    70.4%
    88.5%
    55.0%
    87.1%
    86.4%
    74.8%
    73.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 4 31B 2|0 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

    Verdict

    Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: the bottom line

    Gemma 4 31B offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    As of August 25, 2026, Gemma 4 31B is 70% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.54 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80 / $1.00 per million tokens ($1.80 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 4 31B Gemini API pricing is $0.14 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct OpenRouter API pricing is $0.80 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Neither Gemma 4 31B nor Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has a published SWE-bench or LiveCodeBench score on this page yet. Use the comparison table for the evals that do exist.

    What is the context window for Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Gemma 4 31B supports a 262K token context window, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. Gemma 4 31B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Gemma 4 31B leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 4 31B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 4 31B through Google and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct through OpenRouter with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and OpenRouter API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 31B and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Gemma 4 31B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

    Gemma 4 31B has a measured throughput of approximately 1.2 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 31B or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input and $0.40/M output. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80/M input and $1.00/M output via OpenRouter.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.