Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B

Comparison

As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 4 31B is 71% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Glimmer-30B. Gemma 4 31B is $0.14 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Glimmer-30B at $0.35 / $1.50. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/

Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

Better value

Gemma 4 31B

Google

$0.54blended / 1M

Input

$0.14

Output

$0.40

262.1K ctx|Open Source

71%

cheaper

Muse Glimmer-30B

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison

Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

Metric

Gemma 4 31B

Muse Glimmer-30B

Provider

Google

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B: the bottom line

Gemma 4 31B offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

View Gemma 4 31B details View Muse Glimmer-30B details

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 4 31B is 71% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.54 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.85 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

How much does Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B cost per million tokens?

Gemma 4 31B Gemini API pricing is $0.14 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Google. Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

Which is better for coding, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Muse Glimmer-30B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 76%. Gemma 4 31B does not have that eval on this page yet.

What is the context window for Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemma 4 31B supports a 262K token context window, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. Gemma 4 31B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemma 4 31B leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks versus Muse Glimmer-30B's 2 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

Is Gemma 4 31B or Muse Glimmer-30B better for production use?

Both Gemma 4 31B and Muse Glimmer-30B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 4 31B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

Can I switch between Gemma 4 31B and Muse Glimmer-30B in my app?

Yes. Call Gemma 4 31B through Google and Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

How accurate is this Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing data?

List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

What is the output token limit for Gemma 4 31B and Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemma 4 31B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

Which model has better throughput, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Glimmer-30B?

Gemma 4 31B has a measured throughput of approximately 1.2030715399542904 tokens/second. Throughput data for Muse Glimmer-30B is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

How do I switch the models in this Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison?

Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 4 31B or Muse Glimmer-30B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing

This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input and $0.40/M output. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output.

Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.