Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K2 Instruct is 94% cheaper per million tokens than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $3.00 / $15.00 per million input/output tokens versus Kimi K2 Instruct at $0.50 / $0.50. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Moonshot AI pricing (https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat)

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet

    Anthropic

    $18.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $3.00

    Output

    $15.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    94%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Kimi K2 Instruct

    Moonshot AI

    $1.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.50

    Output

    $0.50

    200K ctx|Open Source
    Save $17.00 per million tokens by choosing Kimi K2 Instruct over Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet
    Kimi K2 Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Moonshot AI
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-06-21
    2025-07-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+500%
    $3.00
    $0.50
    Output Price+2900%
    $15.00
    $0.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $18.00
    $1.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    200K
    Max Output Tokens
    200K
    200K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    April 2024
    N/A
    Throughput
    78 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    4.7%
    59.4%
    75.1%
    54.0%
    71.5%
    31%
    89.8%
    6.5%
    49.5%
    69.6%
    97.4%
    90.4%
    89.5%
    68.3%
    92%
    93.3%
    71.1%
    76.5%
    89.5%
    95.6%
    74.3%
    50.4%
    78.4%
    17.5%
    87.1%
    96.4%
    97.3%
    38.8%
    81.1%
    1.3%
    76.4%
    84.0%
    91.6%
    91.0%
    76.1%
    81.1%
    92.7%
    85.7%
    76.4%
    27.1%
    65.1%
    27.5%
    26.3%
    57.2%
    70.2%
    25%
    60%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet 4|7 Kimi K2 Instruct

    Verdict

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct: the bottom line

    Kimi K2 Instruct offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2 Instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Kimi K2 Instruct is 94% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Kimi K2 Instruct costs $0.50 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens ($1.00 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00 / $15.00 per million tokens ($18.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $3.00 input and $15.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Kimi K2 Instruct Moonshot AI API pricing is $0.50 input and $0.50 output per million tokens via Moonshot AI. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2 Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 49% vs Kimi K2 Instruct at 43.8%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports a 200K token context window, while Kimi K2 Instruct supports 200K tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2 Instruct?

    Kimi K2 Instruct leads on 7 of 11 shared benchmarks versus Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 4 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2 Instruct better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi K2 Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Kimi K2 Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi K2 Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.5 Sonnet through Anthropic and Kimi K2 Instruct through Moonshot AI with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Moonshot AI API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi K2 Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports up to 200K output tokens per request, while Kimi K2 Instruct supports up to 200K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2 Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a measured throughput of approximately 78 tokens/second. Throughput data for Kimi K2 Instruct is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2 Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2 Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. Kimi K2 Instruct costs $0.50/M input and $0.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.