Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 96% cheaper per million tokens than Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is $3.00 / $15.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2.5 72B Instruct at $0.35 / $0.40. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet

    Anthropic

    $18.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $3.00

    Output

    $15.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    96%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.75blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.35

    Output

    $0.40

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $17.25 per million tokens by choosing Qwen2.5 72B Instruct over Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet
    Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-06-21
    2024-09-19
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+757%
    $3.00
    $0.35
    Output Price+3650%
    $15.00
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $18.00
    $0.75
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    200K
    8.2K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    April 2024
    2024-09-24
    Throughput
    78 tok/s
    10 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    59.4%
    49%
    54.0%
    49.1%
    84.1%
    6.5%
    8.1%
    90.4%
    84.2%
    68.3%
    92%
    86.6%
    71.1%
    83.1%
    81.6%
    81.2%
    17.5%
    87.1%
    96.4%
    95.8%
    52.3%
    88.2%
    91.6%
    76.1%
    71.1%
    86.8%
    93.5%
    75.1%
    27.5%
    60%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude 3.5 Sonnet 6|2 Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

    Verdict

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: the bottom line

    Qwen2.5 72B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is 96% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens ($0.75 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00 / $15.00 per million tokens ($18.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $3.00 input and $15.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.35 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 49%. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports a 200K token context window, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads on 6 of 8 shared benchmarks versus Qwen2.5 72B Instruct's 2 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for production use?

    Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude 3.5 Sonnet through Anthropic and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports up to 200K output tokens per request, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports up to 8K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet runs at approximately 78 tokens/second while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct runs at 10 tokens/second. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.