Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 94% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Opus 4.1. Claude Opus 4.1 is $15.00 / $75.00 per million input/output tokens versus DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max at $1.74 / $3.48. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); DeepSeek API pricing (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing)

    Claude Opus 4.1

    Anthropic

    $90.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $15.00

    Output

    $75.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    94%
    cheaper
    Better value

    DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

    DeepSeek

    $5.22blended / 1M

    Input

    $1.74

    Output

    $3.48

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $84.78 per million tokens by choosing DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max over Claude Opus 4.1.

    Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Opus 4.1
    DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    DeepSeek
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-08-05
    2026-04-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+762%
    $15.00
    $1.74
    Output Price+2055%
    $75.00
    $3.48
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $90.00
    $5.22
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    32K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    120 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    11.5%
    48.2%
    80.9%
    90.1%
    76.8%
    89.7%
    64.6%
    93.5%
    50%
    83.4%
    34.8%
    57.9%
    51.8%
    73.6%
    89.5%
    43.6%
    78%
    96.7%
    93%
    73.7%
    100%
    12.9%
    84.4%
    95.2%
    12.5%
    73.6%
    41.4%
    92.5%
    71.8%
    94.2%
    87.2%
    87.5%
    83.5%
    31.4%
    71.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Opus 4.1 0|8 DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

    Verdict

    Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max: the bottom line

    DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

    As of August 20, 2026, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is 94% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs $1.74 per million input tokens and $3.48 per million output tokens ($5.22 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 / $75.00 per million tokens ($90.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max cost per million tokens?

    Claude Opus 4.1 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $15.00 input and $75.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max DeepSeek API pricing is $1.74 input and $3.48 output per million tokens via DeepSeek. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

    DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Opus 4.1 at 74.5% vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max at 80.6%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

    Claude Opus 4.1 supports a 200K token context window, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max supports 1M tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

    DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks versus Claude Opus 4.1's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max better for production use?

    Both Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Opus 4.1 through Anthropic and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max through DeepSeek with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and DeepSeek API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Opus 4.1 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

    Claude Opus 4.1 supports up to 32K output tokens per request, while DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max?

    Claude Opus 4.1 has a measured throughput of approximately 120 tokens/second. Throughput data for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Opus 4.1 or DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Opus 4.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs $1.74/M input and $3.48/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.