Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 96% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Opus 5. Claude Opus 5 is $5.00 / $25.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking at $0.20 / $1.00. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Claude Opus 5

    Anthropic

    $30.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $5.00

    Output

    $25.00

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    96%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

    Qwen

    $1.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $28.80 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking over Claude Opus 5.

    Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Opus 5
    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-07-24
    2025-09-22
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+2400%
    $5.00
    $0.20
    Output Price+2400%
    $25.00
    $1.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $30.00
    $1.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    32.8K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-05
    N/A
    Throughput
    3.437096666269855 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    64.7%
    74.4%
    92.9%
    73.7%
    73.7%
    55.7%
    1711.88
    90.8%
    56.7%
    23.9%
    81.7%
    90.4%
    70.6%
    30.6%
    80.6%
    85.8%
    63%
    56.6%
    93.3%
    83.1%
    87.6%
    89.9%
    86.9%
    43.5%
    30.2%
    68.6%
    65.4%
    77.8%
    62.7%
    86.9%
    73.2%
    29.1%
    40.7%
    73.6%
    45.3%
    53.4%
    24%
    67.6%
    74.5%
    91.7%
    59.2%
    65.7%
    63.6%
    91.0%
    78.9%
    88.9%
    91.6%
    80.5%
    76.1%
    90.9%
    76%
    75.5%
    77.6%
    73%
    72%
    83.9%
    42.3%
    70.6%
    51.7%
    77.4%
    49.4%
    94.7%
    60.4%
    56.4%
    75.1%
    73.3%
    75%
    85.2%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Opus 5 4|0 Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

    Verdict

    Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: the bottom line

    Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking offers significantly lower pricing, while Claude Opus 5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 96% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens ($1.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00 / $25.00 per million tokens ($30.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking cost per million tokens?

    Claude Opus 5 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $5.00 input and $25.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking Qwen API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

    Claude Opus 5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 96%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

    Claude Opus 5 supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 262K tokens. Claude Opus 5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

    Claude Opus 5 leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking better for production use?

    Both Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Opus 5 through Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Opus 5 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

    Claude Opus 5 supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports up to 33K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

    Claude Opus 5 has a measured throughput of approximately 3.437096666269855 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Opus 5 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.