Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 84% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Sonnet 4. Claude Sonnet 4 is $3.00 / $15.00 per million input/output tokens versus Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at $0.30 / $2.50. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing)

    Claude Sonnet 4

    Anthropic

    $18.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $3.00

    Output

    $15.00

    200K ctx|Proprietary
    84%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

    Google

    $2.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $2.50

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    Save $15.20 per million tokens by choosing Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite over Claude Sonnet 4.

    Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Sonnet 4
    Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Google
    License
    Proprietary
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2025-05-22
    2026-07-21
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+900%
    $3.00
    $0.30
    Output Price+500%
    $15.00
    $2.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $18.00
    $2.80
    Model Details
    Context Window
    200K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    64K
    65.5K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    2026-03-31
    Throughput
    101 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    7.8%
    75.4%
    77.8%
    75.8%
    59.7%
    79.0%
    40.0%
    40.9%
    5.9%
    10.3%
    38.6%
    74%
    86.5%
    76.5%
    70.5%
    60%
    90.3%
    74.4%
    83.6%
    84.4%
    54.7%
    60.7%
    0.3%
    0%
    35%
    72.3%
    43.2%
    10%
    6.5%
    26.2%
    33.9%
    43.5%
    90.3%
    72.4%
    70.9%
    93.0%
    39.2%
    79.4%
    85.8%
    21.3%
    35%
    47.3%
    45.5%
    74.8%
    54.2%
    69.6%
    72.6%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Sonnet 4 5|15 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

    Verdict

    Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: the bottom line

    Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 84% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens ($2.80 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.00 / $15.00 per million tokens ($18.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite cost per million tokens?

    Claude Sonnet 4 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $3.00 input and $15.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini API pricing is $0.30 input and $2.50 output per million tokens via Google. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

    Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads on SWE-bench Verified: Claude Sonnet 4 at 72.7% vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite at 75%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

    Claude Sonnet 4 supports a 200K token context window, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1M tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

    Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite leads on 15 of 20 shared benchmarks versus Claude Sonnet 4's 5 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite better for production use?

    Both Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Sonnet 4 through Anthropic and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite through Google with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Gemini API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Sonnet 4 and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

    Claude Sonnet 4 supports up to 64K output tokens per request, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports up to 66K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

    Claude Sonnet 4 has a measured throughput of approximately 101 tokens/second. Throughput data for Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Sonnet 4 or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Sonnet 4 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.