Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 91% cheaper per million tokens than Claude Sonnet 5. Claude Sonnet 5 is $2.00 / $10.00 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking at $0.10 / $1.00. Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Anthropic Claude API pricing (https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Claude Sonnet 5

    Anthropic

    $12.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $10.00

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    91%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

    Qwen

    $1.10blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $1.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $10.90 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking over Claude Sonnet 5.

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Claude Sonnet 5
    Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
    Provider
    Provider
    Anthropic
    Qwen
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-06-30
    2025-09-22
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+1900%
    $2.00
    $0.10
    Output Price+900%
    $10.00
    $1.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $12.00
    $1.10
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    64K
    262.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    57.4%
    64.1%
    80.3%
    61.2%
    53.9%
    53.9%
    53.6%
    1544.16
    84.7%
    25%
    82.6%
    81.2%
    31.4%
    74.7%
    57%
    88.3%
    50.3%
    80%
    74.5%
    81.5%
    83.0%
    84.9%
    32.5%
    72.2%
    37.3%
    67.3%
    63.4%
    73.8%
    86.7%
    83.9%
    67.0%
    16.9%
    94.2%
    66.3%
    47.3%
    38.8%
    81.6%
    53.1%
    64.6%
    53.5%
    47.5%
    76.0%
    75.7%
    86.7%
    87.5%
    73.6%
    65%
    70.8%
    73.2%
    75%
    73.6%
    69.3%
    80.8%
    39.4%
    59.4%
    44.6%
    73.2%
    48.9%
    92.9%
    60.6%
    46.5%
    46.8%
    75.6%
    79.5%
    69.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Claude Sonnet 5 4|0 Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

    Verdict

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking: the bottom line

    Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking offers significantly lower pricing, while Claude Sonnet 5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 91% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens ($1.10 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 / $10.00 per million tokens ($12.00 blended). Sources: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking cost per million tokens?

    Claude Sonnet 5 Claude API pricing from Anthropic is $2.00 input and $10.00 output per million tokens via Anthropic. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking Qwen API pricing is $0.10 input and $1.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

    Claude Sonnet 5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 85.2%. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

    Claude Sonnet 5 supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports 262K tokens. Claude Sonnet 5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

    Claude Sonnet 5 leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking better for production use?

    Both Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking in my app?

    Yes. Call Claude Sonnet 5 through Anthropic and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Claude API pricing from Anthropic and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

    Claude Sonnet 5 supports up to 64K output tokens per request, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports up to 262K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

    Claude Sonnet 5 has a measured throughput of approximately 42 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Claude Sonnet 5 or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking costs $0.10/M input and $1.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.