Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is 67% cheaper per million tokens than Gemini 3.7 Flash. Gemini 3.7 Flash is $0.75 / $3.75 per million input/output tokens versus LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Gemini 3.7 Flash

    Google

    $4.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.75

    Output

    $3.75

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    67%
    cheaper
    Better value

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

    Meituan

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $3.00 per million tokens by choosing LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 over Gemini 3.7 Flash.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Gemini 3.7 Flash
    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Meituan
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-13
    2026-01-14
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+150%
    $0.75
    $0.30
    Output Price+213%
    $3.75
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $4.50
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    65.5K
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-03-31
    N/A
    Throughput
    12.65240051066044 tok/s
    100 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    25.2%
    80.5%
    94.8%
    65.5%
    88.7%
    82.8%
    56.6%
    71.2%
    88.7%
    97.2%
    99.6%
    89.0%
    71.3%
    34%
    50.8%
    53.6%
    82.1%
    85.4%
    53.4%
    83.9%
    90.1%
    97%
    47.9%
    49.2%
    65.9%
    74.7%
    79.4%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemini 3.7 Flash 2|1 LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601

    Verdict

    Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601: the bottom line

    LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 offers significantly lower pricing, while Gemini 3.7 Flash leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    As of August 20, 2026, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is 67% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75 / $3.75 per million tokens ($4.50 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 cost per million tokens?

    Gemini 3.7 Flash Gemini API pricing is $0.75 input and $3.75 output per million tokens via Google. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 Meituan API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Meituan. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.7 Flash or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    Gemini 3.7 Flash leads on SWE-bench Verified: Gemini 3.7 Flash at 80.8% vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 at 70%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    Gemini 3.7 Flash supports a 1M token context window, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports 128K tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemini 3.7 Flash or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    Gemini 3.7 Flash leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks versus LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 better for production use?

    Both Gemini 3.7 Flash and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemini 3.7 Flash and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemini 3.7 Flash through Google and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 through Meituan with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Meituan API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemini 3.7 Flash and LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    Gemini 3.7 Flash supports up to 66K output tokens per request, while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemini 3.7 Flash or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601?

    Gemini 3.7 Flash runs at approximately 12.65240051066044 tokens/second while LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 runs at 100 tokens/second. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemini 3.7 Flash or LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output. LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.