Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 2 27B is 84% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen3.8 Max. Gemma 2 27B is $0.65 / $0.65 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.8 Max at $2.00 / $6.00. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing)

    Better value

    Gemma 2 27B

    Google

    $1.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.65

    Output

    $0.65

    8.2K ctx|Open Source
    84%
    cheaper

    Qwen3.8 Max

    Qwen

    $8.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $2.00

    Output

    $6.00

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $6.70 per million tokens by choosing Gemma 2 27B over Qwen3.8 Max.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Gemma 2 27B
    Qwen3.8 Max
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-06-27
    2026-08-02
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-68%
    $0.65
    $2.00
    Output Price-89%
    $0.65
    $6.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.30
    $8.00
    Model Details
    Context Window
    8.2K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    43.6%
    92.6%
    36.5%
    92.7%
    57.5%
    46.3%
    82.8%
    86.1%
    72.5%
    82.3%
    1.4%
    99.4%
    75.2%
    88.0%
    86.4%
    51.8%
    42.3%
    55.1%
    75.1%
    85.3%
    71.4%
    88.6%
    74.9%
    84.8%
    65.8%
    74.8%
    60.1%
    77.8%
    73.5%
    74%
    60.2%
    73%
    53.4%
    38.2%
    66.3%
    81.8%
    62.6%
    40.7%
    85.0%
    88.6%
    77.8%
    92.9%
    55.9%
    83.2%
    73.2%
    1713
    51.3%
    70.2%
    53.7%
    75.5%
    83.7%
    81.9%
    83.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 2 27B 0|2 Qwen3.8 Max

    Verdict

    Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max: the bottom line

    Gemma 2 27B offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen3.8 Max leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?

    As of August 20, 2026, Gemma 2 27B is 84% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65 per million input tokens and $0.65 per million output tokens ($1.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00 / $6.00 per million tokens ($8.00 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 2 27B Gemini API pricing is $0.65 input and $0.65 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Qwen3.8 Max Qwen API pricing is $2.00 input and $6.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?

    Qwen3.8 Max has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 85.6%. Gemma 2 27B does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max?

    Gemma 2 27B supports a 8K token context window, while Qwen3.8 Max supports 1M tokens. Qwen3.8 Max offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?

    Qwen3.8 Max leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 2 27B's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Max better for production use?

    Both Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3.8 Max are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Gemma 2 27B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3.8 Max in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 2 27B through OpenRouter and Qwen3.8 Max through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 2 27B and Qwen3.8 Max?

    Gemma 2 27B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen3.8 Max supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Max?

    Neither Gemma 2 27B nor Qwen3.8 Max has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 2 27B or Qwen3.8 Max from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 2 27B costs $0.65/M input and $0.65/M output via OpenRouter. Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00/M input and $6.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.