GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3-Coder is 87% cheaper per million tokens than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $0.60 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3-Coder at $0.18 / $0.18. Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Z AI pricing (https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    GLM-4.6

    Z AI

    $2.80blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.60

    Output

    $2.20

    202.8K ctx|Open Source
    87%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3-Coder

    Qwen

    $0.36blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.18

    Output

    $0.18

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $2.44 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3-Coder over GLM-4.6.

    GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    GLM-4.6
    Qwen3-Coder
    Provider
    Provider
    Z AI
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-09-30
    2025-01-01
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+233%
    $0.60
    $0.18
    Output Price+1122%
    $2.20
    $0.18
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $2.80
    $0.36
    Model Details
    Context Window
    202.8K
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    131.1K
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    85 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    17.2%
    81%
    74.5%
    38.4%
    45.1%
    93.9%
    72.4%
    56.8%
    1.1%
    4.3%
    92.2%
    89.8%
    82.2%
    66.2%

    Verdict

    GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Qwen3-Coder has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless GLM-4.6's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3-Coder is 87% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3-Coder costs $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.18 per million output tokens ($0.36 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). GLM-4.6 costs $0.60 / $2.20 per million tokens ($2.80 blended). Sources: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder cost per million tokens?

    GLM-4.6 Z AI API pricing is $0.60 input and $2.20 output per million tokens via Z AI. Qwen3-Coder Qwen API pricing is $0.18 input and $0.18 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder?

    GLM-4.6 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 68%. Qwen3-Coder does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder?

    GLM-4.6 supports a 203K token context window, while Qwen3-Coder supports 256K tokens. Qwen3-Coder offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder?

    Shared benchmark scores for GLM-4.6 and Qwen3-Coder are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder better for production use?

    Both GLM-4.6 and Qwen3-Coder are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3-Coder has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GLM-4.6 and Qwen3-Coder in my app?

    Yes. Call GLM-4.6 through Z AI and Qwen3-Coder through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Z AI API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GLM-4.6 and Qwen3-Coder?

    GLM-4.6 supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Qwen3-Coder supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder?

    GLM-4.6 has a measured throughput of approximately 85 tokens/second. Throughput data for Qwen3-Coder is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GLM-4.6 or Qwen3-Coder from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GLM-4.6 vs Qwen3-Coder pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GLM-4.6 costs $0.60/M input and $2.20/M output. Qwen3-Coder costs $0.18/M input and $0.18/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.