As of August 20, 2026, GPT OSS 120B is 64% cheaper per million tokens than Inkling-Small. GPT OSS 120B is $0.09 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens versus Inkling-Small at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai
Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Thinking Machines Lab pricing (https://thinkingmachines.ai)
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
Input
$0.09
Output
$0.45
Inkling-Small
Thinking Machines
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side
GPT OSS 120BInkling-SmallVerdict
GPT OSS 120B offers significantly lower pricing, while Inkling-Small leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.
As of August 20, 2026, GPT OSS 120B is 64% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens ($0.54 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Inkling-Small costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
GPT OSS 120B OpenAI API pricing is $0.09 input and $0.45 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Thinking Machines Lab. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Inkling-Small leads on SWE-bench Verified: GPT OSS 120B at 33.6% vs Inkling-Small at 80.2%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.
GPT OSS 120B supports a 131K token context window, while Inkling-Small supports 256K tokens. Inkling-Small offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Inkling-Small leads on 10 of 11 shared benchmarks versus GPT OSS 120B's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Both GPT OSS 120B and Inkling-Small are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GPT OSS 120B has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Yes. Call GPT OSS 120B through OpenAI and Inkling-Small through Thinking Machines Lab with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and Thinking Machines Lab API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
GPT OSS 120B supports up to 131K output tokens per request, while Inkling-Small supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Neither GPT OSS 120B nor Inkling-Small has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GPT OSS 120B or Inkling-Small from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output. Inkling-Small costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via Thinking Machines Lab.
Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.
The index
280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
