IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 83% cheaper per million tokens than Qwen2 72B Instruct. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is $0.02 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen2 72B Instruct at $0.35 / $0.40. Sources: https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing

    Sources: OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro); Qwen pricing (https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing)

    Better value

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

    IBM

    $0.13blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.02

    Output

    $0.11

    131K ctx|Open Source
    83%
    cheaper

    Qwen2 72B Instruct

    Qwen

    $0.75blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.35

    Output

    $0.40

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.62 per million tokens by choosing IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview over Qwen2 72B Instruct.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewQwen2 72B Instruct

    Score vs price

    MMLU. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceIBM Granite 4.0 Tiny PreviewQwen2 72B Instruct
    Metric
    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
    Qwen2 72B Instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    IBM
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-05-02
    2024-07-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-95%
    $0.02
    $0.35
    Output Price-72%
    $0.11
    $0.40
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.13
    $0.75
    Model Details
    Context Window
    131K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    42.4%
    40.8%
    63%
    60.4%
    82.3%
    87.6%
    82.4%
    86%
    59.7%
    68.9%
    26.7%
    86.1%
    82.4%
    83.8%
    90.1%
    46.2%
    79%
    70.1%
    91.1%
    80.2%
    64.4%
    69.2%
    22.9%
    44.4%
    58.1%
    54.8%
    85.1%
    Benchmark Wins
    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview 1|3 Qwen2 72B Instruct

    Verdict

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct: the bottom line

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview offers significantly lower pricing, while Qwen2 72B Instruct leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen2 72B Instruct?

    As of August 30, 2026, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 83% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview costs $0.02 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens ($0.13 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Qwen2 72B Instruct costs $0.35 / $0.40 per million tokens ($0.75 blended). Sources: https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct cost per million tokens?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview OpenRouter API pricing is $0.02 input and $0.11 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Qwen2 72B Instruct Qwen API pricing is $0.35 input and $0.40 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen2 72B Instruct?

    Qwen2 72B Instruct leads on HumanEval: IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview at 82.4% vs Qwen2 72B Instruct at 86%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports a 131K token context window, while Qwen2 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens. Qwen2 72B Instruct offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen2 72B Instruct?

    Qwen2 72B Instruct leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks versus IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen2 72B Instruct better for production use?

    Both IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen2 72B Instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen2 72B Instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview through OpenRouter and Qwen2 72B Instruct through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenRouter API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://openrouter.ai/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-h-micro and https://www.alibabacloud.com/help/en/model-studio/pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview and Qwen2 72B Instruct?

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Qwen2 72B Instruct supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen2 72B Instruct?

    Neither IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview nor Qwen2 72B Instruct has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview or Qwen2 72B Instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview vs Qwen2 72B Instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview costs $0.02/M input and $0.11/M output via OpenRouter. Qwen2 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.