As of August 20, 2026, Hy3 is 64% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Glimmer-30B. Hy3 is $0.13 / $0.53 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Glimmer-30B at $0.35 / $1.50. Sources: https://www.tencentcloud.com/document/product/1300/78937 and https://llama.meta.com/
Sources: Tencent pricing (https://www.tencentcloud.com/document/product/1300/78937); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)
Hy3
Tencent
Input
$0.13
Output
$0.53
Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Input
$0.35
Output
$1.50
Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side
Hy3Muse Glimmer-30BVerdict
Hy3 offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.
As of August 20, 2026, Hy3 is 64% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Hy3 costs $0.13 per million input tokens and $0.53 per million output tokens ($0.66 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.85 blended). Sources: https://www.tencentcloud.com/document/product/1300/78937 and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
Hy3 Tencent API pricing is $0.13 input and $0.53 output per million tokens via Tencent. Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Hy3 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Hy3 at 78% vs Muse Glimmer-30B at 76%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.
Hy3 supports a 262K token context window, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. Hy3 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Hy3 leads on 8 of 9 shared benchmarks versus Muse Glimmer-30B's 1 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Both Hy3 and Muse Glimmer-30B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Hy3 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Yes. Call Hy3 through Tencent and Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
List rates are the latest published Tencent API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://www.tencentcloud.com/document/product/1300/78937 and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
Hy3 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Neither Hy3 nor Muse Glimmer-30B has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Hy3 or Muse Glimmer-30B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Hy3 costs $0.13/M input and $0.53/M output. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output.
Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.
The index
280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
