GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna is 7% cheaper per million tokens than Inkling-Small. GPT-5.6 Luna is $0.20 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus Inkling-Small at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai

    Sources: OpenAI API pricing (https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing); Thinking Machines Lab pricing (https://thinkingmachines.ai)

    Better value

    GPT-5.6 Luna

    OpenAI

    $1.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.20

    1.1M ctx|Proprietary
    7%
    cheaper

    Inkling-Small

    Thinking Machines

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.10 per million tokens by choosing GPT-5.6 Luna over Inkling-Small.

    GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    GPT-5.6 Luna
    Inkling-Small
    Provider
    Provider
    OpenAI
    Thinking Machines
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-07-09
    2026-07-30
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-33%
    $0.20
    $0.30
    Output Price0%
    $1.20
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.40
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1.1M
    256K
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    256K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2026-02-16
    N/A
    Throughput
    48.45216448188169 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    31.6%
    92.3%
    89.5%
    63.6%
    88.5%
    67.2%
    67.2%
    52.5%
    48.7%
    1522.94
    77.1%
    19.1%
    83.3%
    77.4%
    41.7%
    19.5%
    82.2%
    55.0%
    41.3%
    59.5%
    40.1%
    53.4%
    54.4%
    79.6%
    78.4%
    74%
    77.4%
    78.6%
    40%
    90%
    85.0%
    30.6%
    95.5%
    84%
    0.2%
    63.1%
    44.5%
    13.7%
    64.2%
    69.6%
    20.6%
    8.3%
    83.9%
    68.8%
    67.1%
    31.8%
    33.2%
    12.4%
    39.8%
    22.7%
    42.3%
    55.8%
    72.9%
    22.4%
    51.2%
    30.4%
    42.4%
    37.9%
    84.4%
    84.1%
    77%
    86.0%
    85.6%
    41.3%
    1.7%
    45.6%
    41.9%
    44.2%
    32.7%
    46.8%
    60.5%
    33.6%
    62.7%
    55.9%
    15.5%
    76.2%
    75.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    GPT-5.6 Luna 23|5 Inkling-Small

    Verdict

    GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small: the bottom line

    GPT-5.6 Luna offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small FAQ

    Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling-Small?

    As of August 20, 2026, GPT-5.6 Luna is 7% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens ($1.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Inkling-Small costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small cost per million tokens?

    GPT-5.6 Luna OpenAI API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via OpenAI. Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Thinking Machines Lab. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling-Small?

    GPT-5.6 Luna leads on SWE-bench Verified: GPT-5.6 Luna at 93% vs Inkling-Small at 80.2%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.

    What is the context window for GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small?

    GPT-5.6 Luna supports a 1M token context window, while Inkling-Small supports 256K tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling-Small?

    GPT-5.6 Luna leads on 23 of 28 shared benchmarks versus Inkling-Small's 5 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling-Small better for production use?

    Both GPT-5.6 Luna and Inkling-Small are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, GPT-5.6 Luna has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between GPT-5.6 Luna and Inkling-Small in my app?

    Yes. Call GPT-5.6 Luna through OpenAI and Inkling-Small through Thinking Machines Lab with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenAI API pricing and Thinking Machines Lab API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing and https://thinkingmachines.ai. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for GPT-5.6 Luna and Inkling-Small?

    GPT-5.6 Luna supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while Inkling-Small supports up to 256K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling-Small?

    GPT-5.6 Luna has a measured throughput of approximately 48.45216448188169 tokens/second. Throughput data for Inkling-Small is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open GPT-5.6 Luna or Inkling-Small from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    GPT-5.6 Luna vs Inkling-Small pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. GPT-5.6 Luna costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output. Inkling-Small costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via Thinking Machines Lab.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    0 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.