Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 10% cheaper per million tokens than Kimi K2.5. Kimi K2.5 is $0.59 / $3.09 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 at $0.30 / $3.00. Sources: https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/

    Sources: Moonshot AI pricing (https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat); Qwen pricing (https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/)

    Kimi K2.5

    Moonshot AI

    $3.68blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.59

    Output

    $3.09

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    10%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

    Qwen

    $3.30blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $3.00

    262.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $0.38 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 over Kimi K2.5.

    Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Kimi K2.5
    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
    Provider
    Provider
    Moonshot AI
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-01-27
    2025-07-25
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+97%
    $0.59
    $0.30
    Output Price+3%
    $3.09
    $3.00
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $3.68
    $3.30
    Model Details
    Context Window
    262.1K
    262.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    262.1K
    131.1K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    50.2%
    18.2%
    87.6%
    81.1%
    80.0%
    31.9%
    48.7%
    42.4%
    1430.56
    74.9%
    50.1%
    87.8%
    70%
    11.8%
    63.3%
    78.5%
    77.5%
    96.1%
    92.3%
    14.4%
    71.9%
    21.3%
    3.1%
    0%
    41.3%
    77.1%
    95.4%
    83.9%
    81%
    92.6%
    69.1%
    75.9%
    84.2%
    87.1%
    84.4%
    81%
    93.8%
    80.4%
    70.4%
    80.6%
    92.3%
    32.5%
    57.4%
    63.5%
    60.1%
    57.4%
    46.8%
    71.2%
    64.9%
    87.4%
    86.6%
    46.3%
    88.3%
    11%
    Benchmark Wins
    Kimi K2.5 8|0 Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

    Verdict

    Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507: the bottom line

    Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 offers significantly lower pricing, while Kimi K2.5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 10% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens ($3.30 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Kimi K2.5 costs $0.59 / $3.09 per million tokens ($3.68 blended). Sources: https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 cost per million tokens?

    Kimi K2.5 Moonshot AI API pricing is $0.59 input and $3.09 output per million tokens via Moonshot AI. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 Qwen API pricing is $0.30 input and $3.00 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

    Kimi K2.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 76.8%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

    Kimi K2.5 supports a 262K token context window, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

    Kimi K2.5 leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 better for production use?

    Both Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in my app?

    Yes. Call Kimi K2.5 through Moonshot AI and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Moonshot AI API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://platform.kimi.com/docs/pricing/chat and https://bailian.console.aliyun.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

    Kimi K2.5 supports up to 262K output tokens per request, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

    Neither Kimi K2.5 nor Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Kimi K2.5 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Kimi K2.5 costs $0.59/M input and $3.09/M output. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.