Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 100% cheaper per million tokens than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is $20.00 / $40.00 per million input/output tokens versus MiniCPM-SALA at $0.10 / $0.10. Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.openbmb.cn/

    Sources: Gemini API pricing (https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing); OpenBMB pricing (https://www.openbmb.cn/)

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

    Google

    $60.00blended / 1M

    Input

    $20.00

    Output

    $40.00

    32K ctx|Proprietary
    100%
    cheaper
    Better value

    MiniCPM-SALA

    OpenBMB

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    32.8K ctx|Open Source
    Save $59.80 per million tokens by choosing MiniCPM-SALA over Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Score vs price

    AIME 2025. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceGemma 3n E4B InstructedMiniCPM-SALA
    Metric
    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
    MiniCPM-SALA
    Provider
    Provider
    Google
    OpenBMB
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-06-26
    2026-02-11
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+19900%
    $20.00
    $0.10
    Output Price+39900%
    $40.00
    $0.10
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $60.00
    $0.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    32K
    32.8K
    Max Output Tokens
    32K
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2024-06-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    42.1 tok/s
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    23.7%
    76.3%
    11.6%
    78.3%
    83.8%
    64.9%
    75%
    95.1%
    81.5%
    81.5%
    19%
    60.3%
    37.7%
    57.2%
    63.6%
    89.1%
    67%
    50.6%
    67.0%
    19.9%
    23.9%
    54.5%
    43.0%
    35.6%
    86.3%
    89.4%
    81.6%
    87.1%
    92.7%
    50.1%
    Benchmark Wins
    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed 0|5 MiniCPM-SALA

    Verdict

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA: the bottom line

    MiniCPM-SALA offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiniCPM-SALA?

    As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA is 100% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00 / $40.00 per million tokens ($60.00 blended). Sources: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.openbmb.cn/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA cost per million tokens?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed Gemini API pricing is $20.00 input and $40.00 output per million tokens via Google. MiniCPM-SALA OpenBMB API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via OpenBMB. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiniCPM-SALA?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a published LiveCodeBench score of 13.2%. MiniCPM-SALA does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports a 32K token context window, while MiniCPM-SALA supports 33K tokens. MiniCPM-SALA offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiniCPM-SALA?

    MiniCPM-SALA leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks versus Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiniCPM-SALA better for production use?

    Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniCPM-SALA are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, MiniCPM-SALA has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniCPM-SALA in my app?

    Yes. Call Gemma 3n E4B Instructed through Google and MiniCPM-SALA through OpenBMB with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Gemini API pricing and OpenBMB API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing and https://www.openbmb.cn/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiniCPM-SALA?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports up to 32K output tokens per request, while MiniCPM-SALA supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiniCPM-SALA?

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a measured throughput of approximately 42.1 tokens/second. Throughput data for MiniCPM-SALA is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiniCPM-SALA from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiniCPM-SALA pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output. MiniCPM-SALA costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    0 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.