How much does MiniCPM-SALA cost per million tokens?
As of August 30, 2026, MiniCPM-SALA OpenBMB API pricing is $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens. Input tokens are the prompt you send; output tokens are the completion. Long answers therefore cost more than short ones even when the prompt stays the same. Source: https://www.openbmb.cn/
What is the blended API cost for MiniCPM-SALA?
On this page the blended MiniCPM-SALA API cost is $0.20 for 1 million input tokens plus 1 million output tokens. That 1:1 mix is the comparison scale used across the LLM pricing table. A 3:1 mix (three million input tokens per one million output tokens), which some calculators use, would be about $0.40.
How much does a typical MiniCPM-SALA request cost?
A typical MiniCPM-SALA API request with 100K input tokens and 20K output tokens costs about $0.01 at current rates as of August 30, 2026. Multiply that by daily or monthly volume to estimate spend. Caching, batch APIs, and volume discounts from OpenBMB can bring the real invoice lower than the public list rate at https://www.openbmb.cn/.
What is the context window for MiniCPM-SALA?
MiniCPM-SALA supports a 33K token context window. The context window is the total prompt plus conversation history the model can see in one call. Larger windows cost more when you fill them, because every input token is billed per million tokens.
Is MiniCPM-SALA open source?
Yes. MiniCPM-SALA is an open-weight model by OpenBMB. You can download the weights and self-host, or pay OpenBMB's hosted API and skip GPU ops. Hosted API pricing on this page is the public per-million-token rate, not the electricity cost of running the weights yourself.
What benchmarks does MiniCPM-SALA perform well on?
MiniCPM-SALA currently reports LiveCodeBench v6 52%, IFEval 76.3%, AIME 2025 78.3%. See the performance table for the full eval set. Use those scores with the token prices above when you are choosing between a cheaper LLM and a frontier model. GPQA, SWE-bench, and HLE are the evals people usually compare first.
Is MiniCPM-SALA good for coding?
MiniCPM-SALA scores 95.1% on HumanEval. Pair that score with OpenBMB API pricing on this page: a slightly worse SWE-bench model can still win if it is much cheaper per million tokens. Open the SWE-bench or coding leaderboard from the sidebar for the full ranking, then jump into an LLM comparison against a coding specialist.
How do I compare MiniCPM-SALA with another LLM?
Use the Compare picker on this page to start an LLM comparison. Search by model or provider, pick a second model, and AnotherWrapper opens a dedicated MiniCPM-SALA vs page with per-million-token prices, blended 1M-in / 1M-out cost, context window, throughput, and benchmarks. You can also open any model from the sidebar, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort the full index.
What are the cheapest alternatives to MiniCPM-SALA?
The cheapest LLM alternative depends on whether you optimize for blended token cost, coding evals, or context window. Start with the popular matchups on this page, then sort the LLM pricing table by blended cost to see which hosted APIs undercut MiniCPM-SALA. Open-weight models can be cheaper still if you self-host, but that is not the same as OpenBMB API pricing on this page.
How do I use MiniCPM-SALA in my application?
MiniCPM-SALA is called through OpenBMB's API with an API key. Bill against input and output tokens separately; cache or shorten prompts if spend is high. If you are shipping a full product, AnotherWrapper includes pre-built API routes and templates for OpenBMB and 5+ other providers with auth, payments, and deployment already configured.
How accurate is this MiniCPM-SALA pricing data?
This MiniCPM-SALA page tracks the latest published OpenBMB API pricing from OpenBMB, quoted per million tokens. List rates can differ from invoices because of prompt caching, batch discounts, committed-use tiers, and private contracts. Official rate sheet: https://www.openbmb.cn/. Benchmark scores come from official publications and independent evals, not from a private lab run by AnotherWrapper.