Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 73% cheaper per million tokens than MiniMax M2.5. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $0.20 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens versus MiniMax M2.5 at $0.30 / $1.20. Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing

    Sources: Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/); AnotherWrapper LLM pricing (https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing)

    Better value

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

    Meta

    $0.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $0.20

    128K ctx|Open Source
    73%
    cheaper

    MiniMax M2.5

    MiniMax

    $1.50blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.30

    Output

    $1.20

    1M ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.10 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.1 70B Instruct over MiniMax M2.5.

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5 comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
    MiniMax M2.5
    Provider
    Provider
    Meta
    MiniMax
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2024-07-23
    2026-02-12
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-33%
    $0.20
    $0.30
    Output Price-83%
    $0.20
    $1.20
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.40
    $1.50
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    128K
    1M
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    42 tok/s
    100 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    41.7%
    44.2%
    82.1%
    76.3%
    87.5%
    4.9%
    3.6%
    88.8%
    84.8%
    83.6%
    80.5%
    36.7%
    90%
    94.8%
    59.6%
    79.6%
    59%
    95.1%
    6.7%
    68%
    92.5%
    74.4%
    86%
    66.4%
    80.1%
    56.7%
    68.2%
    54.2%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct 0|3 MiniMax M2.5

    Verdict

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5: the bottom line

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers significantly lower pricing, while MiniMax M2.5 leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5 FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5?

    As of August 20, 2026, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is 73% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens ($0.40 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.30 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.50 blended). Sources: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5 cost per million tokens?

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Meta API pricing is $0.20 input and $0.20 output per million tokens via Meta. MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax API pricing is $0.30 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via MiniMax. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5?

    MiniMax M2.5 has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 80.2%. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5?

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports a 128K token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 supports 1M tokens. MiniMax M2.5 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5?

    MiniMax M2.5 leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5 better for production use?

    Both Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and MiniMax M2.5 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and MiniMax M2.5 in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 3.1 70B Instruct through Meta and MiniMax M2.5 through MiniMax with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5 pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Meta API pricing and MiniMax API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://llama.meta.com/ and https://anotherwrapper.com/tools/llm-pricing. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 3.1 70B Instruct and MiniMax M2.5?

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports up to 128K output tokens per request, while MiniMax M2.5 supports up to 1M output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5?

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct runs at approximately 42 tokens/second while MiniMax M2.5 runs at 100 tokens/second. MiniMax M2.5 is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5 comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 3.1 70B Instruct or MiniMax M2.5 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 3.1 70B Instruct vs MiniMax M2.5 pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.20/M output. MiniMax M2.5 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.