As of August 20, 2026, Muse Spark 1.1 is 39% cheaper per million tokens than Mistral Medium 3.5. Mistral Medium 3.5 is $1.50 / $7.50 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Spark 1.1 at $1.25 / $4.25. Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://llama.meta.com/
Sources: Mistral AI pricing (https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)
Mistral Medium 3.5
Mistral
Input
$1.50
Output
$7.50
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25
Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side
Mistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.1Verdict
Muse Spark 1.1 offers both lower pricing and stronger benchmark performance across the board, making it the clear value leader in this comparison.
As of August 20, 2026, Muse Spark 1.1 is 39% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens ($5.50 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 / $7.50 per million tokens ($9.00 blended). Sources: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.
Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral API pricing is $1.50 input and $7.50 output per million tokens via Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.1 Meta API pricing is $1.25 input and $4.25 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on SWE-bench Verified: Mistral Medium 3.5 at 77.6% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 82%. SWE-bench measures real GitHub fixes; LiveCodeBench measures contest programming.
Mistral Medium 3.5 supports a 256K token context window, while Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1M tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.
Muse Spark 1.1 leads on 16 of 16 shared benchmarks versus Mistral Medium 3.5's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.
Both Mistral Medium 3.5 and Muse Spark 1.1 are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Muse Spark 1.1 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.
Yes. Call Mistral Medium 3.5 through Mistral AI and Muse Spark 1.1 through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.
List rates are the latest published Mistral API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://docs.mistral.ai/platform/pricing/ and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.
Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 256K output tokens per request, while Muse Spark 1.1 supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.
Mistral Medium 3.5 runs at approximately 0.9605563235026328 tokens/second while Muse Spark 1.1 runs at 6.152425085592334 tokens/second. Muse Spark 1.1 is faster in raw throughput. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.
Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Mistral Medium 3.5 or Muse Spark 1.1 from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.
This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output via Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output.
Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.
The index
280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.
Next step
Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.
