Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B

    Comparison

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 89% cheaper per million tokens than Muse Glimmer-30B. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is $0.04 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens versus Muse Glimmer-30B at $0.35 / $1.50. Sources: https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1 and https://llama.meta.com/

    Sources: NVIDIA pricing (https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1); Meta pricing (https://llama.meta.com/)

    Better value

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1

    NVIDIA

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.04

    Output

    $0.16

    128K ctx|Open Source
    89%
    cheaper

    Muse Glimmer-30B

    Meta

    $1.85blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.35

    Output

    $1.50

    131.1K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.65 per million tokens by choosing Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 over Muse Glimmer-30B.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Shared benchmarks

    Each bar is share of the current leader on that eval. Click a row to open the board.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1Muse Glimmer-30B

    Score vs price

    GPQA. Left is cheaper. Up is a higher score. The line is the best score you can buy at each price.

    Best score at each priceLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1Muse Glimmer-30B
    Metric
    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
    Muse Glimmer-30B
    Provider
    Provider
    NVIDIA
    Meta
    License
    Open Source
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2025-03-18
    2026-08-10
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price-89%
    $0.04
    $0.35
    Output Price-89%
    $0.16
    $1.50
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.20
    $1.85
    Model Details
    Context Window
    128K
    131.1K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    N/A
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2023-12-31
    2026-01-04
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    22%
    54.1%
    83.5%
    43.6%
    79.3%
    77%
    80%
    75.5%
    74%
    78.8%
    47.1%
    95.4%
    94.7%
    65.1%
    63.6%
    74.6%
    43.3%
    84.6%
    81%
    44.3%
    23.5%
    Benchmark Wins
    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 0|1 Muse Glimmer-30B

    Verdict

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B: the bottom line

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 offers significantly lower pricing, while Muse Glimmer-30B leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    As of August 30, 2026, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 is 89% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 costs $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35 / $1.50 per million tokens ($1.85 blended). Sources: https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1 and https://llama.meta.com/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B cost per million tokens?

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 NVIDIA API pricing is $0.04 input and $0.16 output per million tokens via NVIDIA. Muse Glimmer-30B Meta API pricing is $0.35 input and $1.50 output per million tokens via Meta. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    Muse Glimmer-30B has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 76%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B?

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports a 128K token context window, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports 131K tokens. Muse Glimmer-30B offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    Muse Glimmer-30B leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Muse Glimmer-30B better for production use?

    Both Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Muse Glimmer-30B are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Muse Glimmer-30B in my app?

    Yes. Call Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 through NVIDIA and Muse Glimmer-30B through Meta with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published NVIDIA API pricing and Meta API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://build.nvidia.com/nvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-nano-8b-v1 and https://llama.meta.com/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 and Muse Glimmer-30B?

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Muse Glimmer-30B supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Muse Glimmer-30B?

    Neither Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 nor Muse Glimmer-30B has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 or Muse Glimmer-30B from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 vs Muse Glimmer-30B pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1 costs $0.04/M input and $0.16/M output. Muse Glimmer-30B costs $0.35/M input and $1.50/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    343 models across 36 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    2 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Liquid AI

    2 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    OpenBMB

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    Sarvam AI

    2 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.