Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.7 Flash is 70% cheaper per million tokens than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B). Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is $0.09 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens versus Qwen3.7 Flash at $0.03 / $0.13. Sources: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://www.qwencloud.com/models/qwen3.7-flash

    Sources: OpenRouter pricing (https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models); Qwen pricing (https://www.qwencloud.com/models/qwen3.7-flash)

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

    NVIDIA

    $0.54blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.09

    Output

    $0.45

    1M ctx|Open Source
    70%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Qwen3.7 Flash

    Qwen

    $0.16blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.03

    Output

    $0.13

    1M ctx|Proprietary
    Save $0.38 per million tokens by choosing Qwen3.7 Flash over Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
    Qwen3.7 Flash
    Provider
    Provider
    NVIDIA
    Qwen
    License
    Open Source
    Proprietary
    Release Date
    2026-03-11
    2026-07-27
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+200%
    $0.09
    $0.03
    Output Price+246%
    $0.45
    $0.13
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $0.54
    $0.16
    Model Details
    Context Window
    1M
    1M
    Max Output Tokens
    262.1K
    131K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    2025-06-01
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    N/A
    Benchmarks
    22.8%
    82.7%
    82.3%
    42.0%
    31.3%
    72.6%
    58.3%
    90.2%
    86.7%
    41.8%
    94.7%
    83.7%
    79.4%
    91.8%
    86.7%
    Benchmark Wins
    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) 1|0 Qwen3.7 Flash

    Verdict

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash: the bottom line

    Qwen3.7 Flash offers significantly lower pricing, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) leads on benchmark performance. Your choice depends on whether cost efficiency or raw capability matters more for your use case.

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash FAQ

    Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

    As of August 20, 2026, Qwen3.7 Flash is 70% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens ($0.16 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.09 / $0.45 per million tokens ($0.54 blended). Sources: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://www.qwencloud.com/models/qwen3.7-flash. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash cost per million tokens?

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) OpenRouter API pricing is $0.09 input and $0.45 output per million tokens via OpenRouter. Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen API pricing is $0.03 input and $0.13 output per million tokens via Qwen. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 53.7%. Qwen3.7 Flash does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash?

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports a 1M token context window, while Qwen3.7 Flash supports 1M tokens. Both models have the same context window size. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks versus Qwen3.7 Flash's 0 wins. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) or Qwen3.7 Flash better for production use?

    Both Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) and Qwen3.7 Flash are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Qwen3.7 Flash has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) and Qwen3.7 Flash in my app?

    Yes. Call Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) through OpenRouter and Qwen3.7 Flash through Qwen with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published OpenRouter API pricing and Qwen API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://openrouter.ai/api/v1/models and https://www.qwencloud.com/models/qwen3.7-flash. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) and Qwen3.7 Flash?

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports up to 262K output tokens per request, while Qwen3.7 Flash supports up to 131K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) or Qwen3.7 Flash?

    Neither Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) nor Qwen3.7 Flash has published throughput data on this page yet. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) or Qwen3.7 Flash from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) vs Qwen3.7 Flash pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via OpenRouter. Qwen3.7 Flash costs $0.03/M input and $0.13/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.