MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

    Comparison

    As of August 20, 2026, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is 86% cheaper per million tokens than MAI-Code-1.1-Flash. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is $0.20 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens versus Phi-3.5-mini-instruct at $0.10 / $0.10. Sources: https://ai.azure.com and https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/

    Sources: Microsoft pricing (https://ai.azure.com); Microsoft pricing (https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/)

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash

    Microsoft

    $1.40blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.20

    Output

    $1.20

    256K ctx|Proprietary
    86%
    cheaper
    Better value

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

    Microsoft

    $0.20blended / 1M

    Input

    $0.10

    Output

    $0.10

    128K ctx|Open Source
    Save $1.20 per million tokens by choosing Phi-3.5-mini-instruct over MAI-Code-1.1-Flash.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct comparison

    Token pricing, specs, and benchmarks side by side

    Metric
    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
    Provider
    Provider
    Microsoft
    Microsoft
    License
    Proprietary
    Open Source
    Release Date
    2026-08-11
    2024-08-23
    Pricing (per 1M tokens)
    Input Price+100%
    $0.20
    $0.10
    Output Price+1100%
    $1.20
    $0.10
    Blended (1M + 1M)
    $1.40
    $0.20
    Model Details
    Context Window
    256K
    128K
    Max Output Tokens
    N/A
    128K
    Knowledge Cutoff
    N/A
    N/A
    Throughput
    N/A
    23 tok/s
    Benchmarks
    30.4%
    55.4%
    69%
    69.4%
    62.8%
    48.5%
    84.6%
    78%
    25.9%
    86.2%
    69.6%
    61.7%
    62.2%
    46.5%
    63.1%
    47.9%
    47.4%
    79.2%
    81%
    41.9%
    21.3%
    77%
    84.1%
    74.7%
    24.3%
    68.5%

    Verdict

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct: the bottom line

    Both models are closely matched on benchmarks. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct has the pricing advantage, making it the better value unless MAI-Code-1.1-Flash's specific capabilities are critical to your workflow.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct FAQ

    Which is cheaper, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

    As of August 20, 2026, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is 86% cheaper on blended LLM API pricing. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens ($0.20 blended 1M-in + 1M-out). MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20 / $1.20 per million tokens ($1.40 blended). Sources: https://ai.azure.com and https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/. The cheapest LLM for your app still depends on how many output tokens you generate.

    How much does MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct cost per million tokens?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash Microsoft API pricing is $0.20 input and $1.20 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct Microsoft API pricing is $0.10 input and $0.10 output per million tokens via Microsoft. Use those four numbers, not ChatGPT Plus or Claude Pro subscription prices, when you are comparing APIs.

    Which is better for coding, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has a published SWE-bench Verified score of 72.6%. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct does not have that eval on this page yet.

    What is the context window for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports a 256K token context window, while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports 128K tokens. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash offers a larger context window. Filling a larger window bills more input tokens, so the cheaper-per-million model can still cost more on long documents.

    Which model performs better on benchmarks, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

    Shared benchmark scores for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct are still limited. Check the comparison table for the evals each model has published. Check the comparison table for GPQA Diamond, SWE-bench, MMLU, HLE, and the other evals we track. Token price and benchmark score together are the usual LLM comparison, not either number alone.

    Is MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Phi-3.5-mini-instruct better for production use?

    Both MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct are production API models. For cost-sensitive production traffic, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct has better economics on the blended 1M-in + 1M-out scale. For maximum capability, weight the benchmark table for your domain. Many production stacks route cheap models for drafts and a frontier model for the hard turn, which is usually cheaper than sending everything to the expensive API.

    Can I switch between MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct in my app?

    Yes. Call MAI-Code-1.1-Flash through Microsoft and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct through Microsoft with separate API keys, or through a gateway that already wraps both. Keep prompts in tokens, not characters, when you estimate the invoice. AnotherWrapper templates can swap providers without rewriting auth and billing.

    How accurate is this MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct pricing data?

    List rates are the latest published Microsoft API pricing and Microsoft API pricing, quoted per million tokens. Official rate sheets: https://ai.azure.com and https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/cognitive-services/openai-service/. Prompt caching, batch APIs, and committed-use discounts can change the invoice. Benchmark scores are from official publications and independent evals, updated as new numbers land.

    What is the output token limit for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash and Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash supports up to an unspecified number of output tokens per request, while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports up to 128K output tokens. Output tokens are usually the expensive half of API pricing, so a higher max output cap is a capability, not a discount.

    Which model has better throughput, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Phi-3.5-mini-instruct?

    Phi-3.5-mini-instruct has a measured throughput of approximately 23 tokens/second. Throughput data for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is not yet available. Throughput (tokens per second) and time-to-first-token are why two models with the same per-million-token price can still feel different in chat and agents.

    How do I switch the models in this MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct comparison?

    Use the model pickers at the top of this LLM comparison. Search any model in the index and the URL updates. Open MAI-Code-1.1-Flash or Phi-3.5-mini-instruct from the sidebar for the single-model API pricing page, or go back to the LLM pricing table to sort by cheapest blended cost.

    MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Phi-3.5-mini-instruct pricing

    This comparison covers API pricing, context window, throughput, and benchmark scores. MAI-Code-1.1-Flash costs $0.20/M input and $1.20/M output. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output.

    Rank both on the LLM leaderboard, SWE-bench, and Humanity's Last Exam.

    The index

    All Large Language Models

    280 models across 33 providers. Search or jump to a lab — every model page stays linked here.

    Baidu

    1 models

    Inception

    1 models

    inclusionAI

    1 models

    LG AI Research

    1 models

    Nous Research

    1 models

    Sakana AI

    1 models

    StepFun

    1 models

    Tencent

    1 models

    Thinking Machines

    1 models

    Unisound

    1 models

    Upstage

    1 models

    Next step

    You found the model. Now ship the product.

    Auth, billing, and the API layer are already decided. Fork 8 finished AI apps, or have us build the first version with you.